It’s clear to everyone that the prosecution has no case, which means (((we))) won’t get what we want, so I think there’s something wrong with the trial itself, i.e., the judge. I’m writing this to give (((everyone))) something to focus their blame on because (((people))) need to be told why their wants won’t be satisfied. This is the basis for my entire (((culture))), and is the source of all our (((pilpul bullshit))). This is the kind idiocy for which (((my people))) tell each other how special and different how are. Since I’m a perfectly average retarded jew, I uncritically believe all of that shit, too.
>It’s clear to everyone that the prosecution has no case, which means (((we))) won’t get what we want, so I think there’s something wrong with the trial itself, i.e., the judge. I’m writing this to give (((everyone))) something to focus their blame on because (((people))) need to be told why their wants won’t be satisfied. This is the basis for my entire (((culture))), and is the source of all our (((pilpul bullshit))). This is the kind idiocy for which (((my people))) tell each other how special and different how are. Since I’m a perfectly average retarded jew, I uncritically believe all of that shit, too.
Let them continue their lies, it does more to wake the normies than actual news.
Let them continue their lies, it does more to wake the normies than actual news.
The kikess doesn't like that the judge, who should have thrown the trial out long before this point, and still looks like he's going to hand it over to a jury, is saying mean things to the lying sacks of shit comprising the prosecution. Yawn.
The kikess doesn't like that the judge, who should have thrown the trial out long before this point, and still looks like he's going to hand it over to a jury, is saying mean things to the lying sacks of shit comprising the prosecution. Yawn.
REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
But seriously, it's not the judge. To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
# REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
But seriously, it's not the judge. To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
100%. They want a new shot with perfect information of how the Defense will argue. That's what "with prejudice" means. Cant' be retried.
>To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
100%.
They want a new shot with perfect information of how the Defense will argue.
That's what "with prejudice" means. Cant' be retried.
(post is archived)