Been a long road from the wide open stretches of “libertarian” permissiveness to here, but I have now rounded on the theoretical idea that “free speech” be “wide open.”
While I am all for freedom to name call, to raise awareness, to engage in political speech, and to issue a call to action, the sharing of materials that exploit children - and this both includes and stretches beyond “child porn” - must be ended. This would also include material meant to entice children into illicit behavior, such as that Blues Clues abomination or those Steven Universe fag ads.
Wasn't sure where you were going at first. The end all brought it together. Also, don't be a lolberg. They are just anarcho-communists who don't want to admit it.
Nah. I’m a constitutional monarchist, and occasionally a fuckyougetoffmylandican when I don’t want to deal with people anymore.
Don't be what someone on the internet says to not be, because something somewhere is a complex well-defined thing thats kinda like another thing depending on one condition.
(post is archived)