![(((Voal))): "Child Porn should not be regulated" - as (((he))) argues that child exploitation is speech and should be legal. [941x159 - 10KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/x0d3B7.png){kind=link}
The account has been banned on their demand.
https://poal.co/s/News/386553/87929674-5539-4fc5-ae16-40f853f74813#cmnts
The account has been banned on their demand.
https://poal.co/s/News/386553/87929674-5539-4fc5-ae16-40f853f74813#cmnts
I am absolutely fucking floored at the audacity of this fucking kike. https://archive.md/spXyO = https://poal.co/s/News/386553/320ac0ba-6d24-4268-8a55-620c704f9d2b#cmnts https://archive.md/q4ztL = https://poal.co/s/News/386553/f30e13ee-637e-4531-b8f4-51469642ef05#cmnts
I am absolutely fucking floored at the audacity of this fucking kike.
https://archive.md/spXyO = https://poal.co/s/News/386553/320ac0ba-6d24-4268-8a55-620c704f9d2b#cmnts
https://archive.md/q4ztL = https://poal.co/s/News/386553/f30e13ee-637e-4531-b8f4-51469642ef05#cmnts
I think pedophiles should verbally express their desires publicly, so we know who to shoot
I think pedophiles should verbally express their desires publicly, so we know who to shoot
What's this now? Are you supporting child exploitation because muh freeze peach too?
Or am I confused and you're calling (((voal))) out?
What's this now?
Are you supporting child exploitation because muh freeze peach too?
Or am I confused and you're calling (((voal))) out?
Good God, no.
This pedo has a familiar way of words that reminds me of old Voats infamous Joe.
I don't know for sure, but it definitely sounds like him.
Good God, no.
This pedo has a familiar way of words that reminds me of old Voats infamous Joe.
I don't know for sure, but it definitely sounds like him.
Huh. They did kinda read the same now that you mention it.
Huh. They did kinda read the same now that you mention it.
My bad then.
My bad then.
Been a long road from the wide open stretches of “libertarian” permissiveness to here, but I have now rounded on the theoretical idea that “free speech” be “wide open.”
While I am all for freedom to name call, to raise awareness, to engage in political speech, and to issue a call to action, the sharing of materials that exploit children - and this both includes and stretches beyond “child porn” - must be ended. This would also include material meant to entice children into illicit behavior, such as that Blues Clues abomination or those Steven Universe fag ads.
Been a long road from the wide open stretches of “libertarian” permissiveness to here, but I have now rounded on the theoretical idea that “free speech” be “wide open.”
While I am all for freedom to name call, to raise awareness, to engage in political speech, and to issue a call to action, the sharing of materials that exploit children - and this both includes and stretches beyond “child porn” - must be ended. This would also include material meant to entice children into illicit behavior, such as that Blues Clues abomination or those Steven Universe fag ads.
Wasn't sure where you were going at first. The end all brought it together. Also, don't be a lolberg. They are just anarcho-communists who don't want to admit it.
Wasn't sure where you were going at first. The end all brought it together.
Also, don't be a lolberg. They are just anarcho-communists who don't want to admit it.
Nah. I’m a constitutional monarchist, and occasionally a fuckyougetoffmylandican when I don’t want to deal with people anymore.
Nah. I’m a constitutional monarchist, and occasionally a fuckyougetoffmylandican when I don’t want to deal with people anymore.
Don't be what someone on the internet says to not be, because something somewhere is a complex well-defined thing thats kinda like another thing depending on one condition.
Don't be what someone on the internet says to not be, because something somewhere is a complex well-defined thing thats kinda like another thing depending on one condition.
Nice catch. He wasn't on my pedo list, I could have accidently engaged with him (the reason for keeping a list in the first place). I guess since he's banned, there's not much point to add him at this point.
Nice catch. He wasn't on my pedo list, I could have accidently engaged with him (the reason for keeping a list in the first place). I guess since he's banned, there's not much point to add him at this point.
Good he's gone. Disregard me.
Good he's gone. Disregard me.
(post is archived)