Have not heard of this case before. Thanks.
These sick bastards have a disturbing insatiable bloodlust..
Ya, was a "landmark" case. Charles Darrow saved them from the chair by appealing to peoples feels and introducing psychiatrists to explain why they did it. First or one of the first trials that psychiatrist testimony was allowed. Now at every trial of substance, each side has some asshole psychiatrist saying the opposite of the other. It's a joke. Just opinions about what they think makes someone tick, doesn't matter how many framed diplomas are on their walls. Still just a person's opinion and should not be in court.
You may be interested in this History's Mysteries about the case. Pretty good, although siding with the Darrow's tactics and such.
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=yPdTObMv5CQ
Couple more docs on this- I have not watched these:
Thanks for the links.
I agree, psychiatry has no place in a place of court. Judgement should only be based on evidence and the severity of the crime, obviously those kikes deserved the death penalty of the worst kind.
(post is archived)