Don't get me wrong. I believe the Jew is clever, but I also think we make a philosophical mistake when talking about the ontology of intelligence. It isn't one thing. We model it as a one-thing with IQ, and this has varying degrees of utility and predictive value, but we miss important things this way.
I believe there is a fundamentally different intelligence operating in Jews, which is different to the extent that it is a function of their underlying moral strategy. There is a difference between the way a white man attempts to apply intelligence to a society when he shares with his fellow whites a collective intentionality with respect to their values and the rules that follow from them.
The Jew's intelligence is applied in the opposite way, to problem solving by cheating and deceit and game-rigging in a way which is destructive to the overall cooperation and trust in society. They don't play with the same constraints. I believe white men could easily scheme, in principle, as well as the Jew (on average), but we don't because we can't. It's what we create that permits the small Jew population to exploit us the way they do.
This is fundamentally what's going on with Gamestop. The Jew became terrified because a group of goy began to play the game like they do. It won't do for a society to behave this way, not for their strategy to support their mode of being.
The idea that the mean Ashkenazi IQ is a full standard dev above the mean for caucasians is nonsense. I'd wager it's closer to possibly half of a standard deviation, putting them in the same class as some subpopulations of east asian, right around 107 or 108 perhaps.
Those asians can do very well in our system, and yet we don't find them scheming with anti-competitive games and conniving. If they beat you, they are legitimately going to beat you to please their ancestors or something. That's not to say there are not Jewed asians. Of course there are. Everyone starts to play like the Jew once society is sufficiently machiavellian.
The Jew applies its intelligence to creating confusion. Their non-cooperstivity only seems like intelligence when they are able to exploit some system. Had they not the naive soicety to attach to like a parasite, their behavior would look very unintelligent. It looks intelligent because they have overturned your values and made money itself the only economic category for value...so that when they have a good deal of this they look intelligent, without reference to the ways they have gotten it.
Their schemes in the stock market are not complicated. The level of abstraction that comes with creating financial derivatives is huge. It takes intelligence to understand them. But at the level of actual money the games are fairly simple.
TL;DR - I'm just bouncing off that comment with my experience of being "really high IQ" as a white guy, and yes, ultimately, I've found that the whole way of thinking about high IQ has been pretty thoroughly zogged.
So you seem like you'd appreciate my story...It will seem like it's not relevant to your comment at first, but I'm going somewhere with all of it...
I'm a white American male from a small town in the southern Midwest. This story is about my experience with Mensa, but first, some context:
I went through the public school system, and only got straight A's, but it was so painfully easy for me that eventually I wanted to drop out in the 6th grade and start working. Before entering the school system my parents had me tested and the result came back as "gifted". In the fourth grade they tested our reading level and mine came back as 12.9+, above a senior in high school, or "university level", but to be clear, the result was essentially "higher than this test is designed to test for", which would actually be a good phrase to apply to my experience with school "higher than this system is designed to work for. "
Case in point, being born in 1990, I am a poster child for standardized testing. Every year we spent at least a week doing this, and every year I tested across every subject higher than 99.99% of the nation, or put another way, in the top .001%. To put that in context, "gifted" is considered to be in the top 2% of IQ, or, an IQ of 130. I understand that standardized tests are not IQ tests, but they are similar enough to take into consideration.
With all of that said, absolutely nothing was done for me with any of those scores. While I now realize I should have been one of those kids who started college when they were around 12, the best I ever got was to have my desk moved next to a window because, as it was explained to me more than once, "you already understand the material and the other kids need a chance to work with it...feel free to read books or something" So now, hopefully, you can understand why I wanted to drop out of school in the 6th grade. Of course, that never happened and I had to suffer through another 6 years of this...which led to a pretty deep depression, and yeah, I was one of those really smart kids that had some substance abuse issues in high school, but really, not so bad that it stopped me from being productive and "successful" in school.
So I could go on and on, but I've said all of that to set the stage for why I even joined Mensa in the first place. See, you have to understand I've always known I could since I was a fairly young kid. My grandmother was family friends with a couple that were both in Mensa forever, and they gave her a book of Mensa puzzles from probably in the 80s. These puzzle are math problems, pattern recognition problems, logic problems, etc. similar to what you solve to get into Mensa. They are designed by teams of people, sometimes over long periods of time, and they are meant to be VERY difficult. I was solving these problems before I was 10.
I've said none of this to brag, in fact, most days I wish it weren't true. It's never been a blessing, and for most of my life I've felt extremely alienated from the rest of society. It seems to me that, like my reading test, and the public school system, our cradle to grave society itself is, as far as I can tell, literally designed for IQs about 80 to 130ish, but not significantly higher than that. It was only after years of studying extreme "giftedness" and the social/societal/psychological implications of being that, that I started to entertain the idea of joining Mensa.
When I started looking into the organization I saw that they had a "Mensa members" section on a popular dating site. Anyone who knows about the fundamental difference between the male and female bell curves knows why super high IQ guys can have a rough time romantically. So, I decided I'd join. I wasn't stressed about the test because I already knew I'd get in. And yes, when I took it I found it easy, to the point that the test proctor, himself a "gifted" member of Mensa, stared at me wide eyed as I blew through the test and eventually told me I got twice as far as he did so I shouldn't worry about getting in. Now for the weird part...
A few weeks later I did get an email with my scores saying I did get in. But immediately got another email saying there was a "glitch" and the wrong scores were sent out. 15 minutes later I got a third email with my "correct" scores, now much lower, but saying that I still barely got in...all of which is odd to me. And at no point was I told what my actual IQ is. Which, after all the research and reading I had done about extreme giftedness, was personally very important to me.
So after a series of strange calls and emails, what I was told by a series of confused high IQ people was apparently that very year Mensa decided to start using a new testing company that was in a probationary period and until Mensa decided to sign a long term contract with them, they wouldn't be giving out specific IQ scores, but only if a person tested bellow, at, or above the 130 mark needed to get in. This was not the first or last time "strangeness" has followed me and my test scores around. At the very least, I know I didn't "barely get in"...
Anyways, I joined Mensa and even went to their big annual gathering that year, only to be pretty underwhelmed by it all. But here's how this ties into Jews and IQ. If the previous paragraph seemed pretty shysty just to get around giving some people their IQ scores, that's because it was, and there's probably a reason for that.
The biggest and last event of the whole week was a musical comedy act made up of a jew and a white hick, the "jew/white hick" shtick being a subtle part of their act. One song was called something like "My Rabbi" and the jew guy was singing some pretty funny, but offensive stuff about being a jew kid and his experiences with "My Rabbi". Let's just say this song would be a hit on Voat/Poal. I didn't notice any awkwardness because I was laughing my ass off, but the jew singing it did and he abruptly stopped and said "I can feel the tension in the air, but it's ok, I'm a member of the tribe." and then continued. I looked around and finally saw looks of relief on everyone's faces and that's when it dawned on me that I was surrounded by jews.
(If you need a good laugh, just visualize the scenario where a blonde haired, blue eyed long time Goat is audibly laughing his ass off to a offensive song called "My Rabbi", blissfully unaware that he is surrounded by a large group of horrified jews. It's one of my prouder moments.)
Anyways...my whole point is, Mensa, like any other organization, is largely a Jewish operation at the top. And no, I don't this zogification is confined to Mensa as a "high IQ organization", but could be applied, as you explained, to the whole notion of high IQ in general. Based on my own personal experience and extensive academic research, instead of cultivating high IQ individuals to benefit society, or completely computerized and systematized society, even post k-12 and higher education, is designed to neutralize any "high IQ-ness" that either challenges the status quo or even just doesn't fall in line with it.
To sum it up, I think a wholistic effort has been made to control the normie perception of what "high IQ" means in society. That to be high IQ means to be a borderline autistic, pointy nosed academic nerd when it could be, and I think is, just as diverse a group of people as anyone else. If we didn't live in such an utterly controlled society, I believe "high IQ" would express itself in our culture in ways most people would never imagine, by design.
I genuinely believe that Voat, Poal, the Chans, etc. are largely the result of "high IQ" not being able to express itself naturally. In fact, I believe that's why we consider ourselves "autists", because that's how the controlled society has been told to think of any expression of high IQ that doesn't perpetuate the control structure...as "mentally ill", usually as "autistic".
One final note on what I just said. I did, just once, go see a therapist who specialized in working with "gifted" people. When I was explaining that I don't just think I'm gifted, but extremely gifted, I explained that, while I don't know my own IQ, my biological uncle has a verified IQ of 160. She responded that an IQ that high does place someone on the autistic spectrum. So yes, actually, just having a really high IQ does get "the system" to label you with a clinical "mental issue". It's not that far fetched to say that our culture/society has totally perverted what "intelligence" actually is.
Sorry for the novel, but I hope it was a good read.
That was a very interesting read. Thank you for taking the time.
I have not had my IQ tested, but in the fourth grade I took the same kind of test that you did. I scored similarly. My teacher and the proctor for the test asked me to stay behind after the rest of the class left for recess, and they asked me a lot of questions, namely whether my parents had been having me tested.
To add context, I grew up in a very small town where perhaps 1% of the population would appreciate the kind of thing they'd held me after class to discuss. The answer was that I had never been tested. My mom had only told me that I began speaking at a very, very young age and was able to conduct conversations with her by the time many children were still babbling in short, simple statements.
Truth told, I don't imagine that my quantitative intelligence is immense. I did just fine in math courses, going up through calculus 3 without much issue. However, I never had the intuitive sense that I was mathematically gifted. Verbal is a different story.
Anyway, I remember being authentically frightened by the way the teacher and the proctor had approached me - I imagine I felt as though I was being interrogated. I kept insisting that I just guessed, to which the lady from the test center kept reassuring me that the tests are designed to eliminate that possibility.
She just kept saying that I was reading at what was likely a collegiate level at the age of 9, and asked whether my mother knew about it. I really didn't know what she was referring to in terms of the object to be known, and the entire concept seemed to elicit something like 'secrecy' in my young mind. The result was that I thought it all must be a bad thing. I remember feeling like I could have been in trouble (in the sense of being 'in trouble' with a parent).
Anyway, I have never been tested. I doubt if I would score an outrageous IQ score. I do feel that I think slowly. Whether it is anxiety or just processing speed weighing in, I find I can think immensely fast in isolation, but in public I can often fall over my words if I am anxious to make a point. Sometimes I experience a frustrating effect where multiple strands of ideas just seem to congeal, cancel each other out, and I am left blank or with the sensation, 'Now you must start over.'
I am rambling. I'll just note that I have experienced some of the typical symptoms of being gifted, or at least nominally superior as far as IQ is concerned strictly. Again, I'd wager my deficit in speed would be a detriment to my score.
I do often feel trapped in my body and situation in the most general sense, like I am very different. I have had that feeling for my entire life. By high school I had discovered heuristics for 'making it' socially, and a little boost from puberty on my body size saw me get through with some success. But I almost always find that I have to conceal myself. It is immensely frustrating. I have almost trained myself to alter my language so that I don't use words that will make me seem condescending. I have to actively scan my language as I am speaking because I am insecure about it; it results in a feeling that I can never really talk with people about what I'd like to - about what actually interests me about things or situations. Instead I do this mechanistic sort of dance based on what I believe another person will expect to be said.
The times where I do get a little passionate and 'lean into' something in my particular way, it seems like people's eyes glaze over. It seems my desire to be accepted has made that a very particular sign that is always very salient to me in conversations, one which I am always looking for as if maintaining the dance is very important. I don't know. I guess I just feel weird most of the time, so I try to seem as interested as possible in what most people are.
Now I am truly ranting.
It looks intelligent because they have overturned your values and made money itself the only economic category for value.
Completely spot on as always Chiro. The realization of a jew-scheme doesn't result in awe like from an amazingly written program or other concept demonstrating raw, original, hard intelligence. Its more like an epiphany where you say in disgusted surprise "oh that's how we're going to play this game?"
I appreciate it. I completely agree. It is really interesting to think about the phenomenology of that kind of encounter with intelligence. With the Jew it strikes you a completely different way, like a totally different form of discovery.
When you encounter one of the supreme examples of classical music, it feels like you are finding what someone could do, given a certain set of rules and constraints. That potential always existed in music, but this composer discovered it.
When I encounter a cunning financial scheme by Jews, I don't think, "Wow so that was in there all along waiting to be discovered." It doesn't hit us like innovation, but more like, "Oh that's what happens when you take the rules and invert them with respect to the overall ends of the game."
Doing something rewarding financially usually (or we think it should anyway) involves producing something real. The benefit that earns you a financial reward comes from something in the thing itself. The Jew doesn't create. They discover ways of using the creativity of others and flipping the value. Oh, how can I turn betting on this person's creative product into a derivative that lets me speculate on someone else's loss (because of this product's gain).
They bet on these abstractions that don't produce anything, and when your economic philosophy literally only values money as a quantity, then suddenly you wind up with a 21st century financial picture where a person who moves money from account to account is making $800 million dollars a year because he is a skilled gambler.
Don't get me wrong, there is intelligence in this. But it always looks like revolution. How do you game the rules of the system to profit. It necessarily relies, however, on the rest of the host population following the normal rules of the game.
It can't last, and we are seeing that. Eventually the host society will catch on, and as the new inverted value system (money only) becomes the direction everyone goes, a society will begin to break down. The society will start playing the Jew game and begin to consume itself.
The Jew then moves on. Sorry I am so long-winded today. I am really interested in what you brought up. There is a real disgust when the logic of the scheme becomes apparent. It is a totally different kind of appreciation. On one hand, you are almost inclined to respect the cleverness, but on the other you want to say, yeah it only works because nobody else wanted to cheat so fuck you.
There is a real way in which the Jew naturally exposes your system like a security test for all the possible ways it can be corrupted and gamed.
Very well written.
(post is archived)