WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://poal.co/s/kikes/273165/703cecc4-ec52-4bab-a3ac-898a4be415e4#cmnts = https://archive.md/Horoq "muh fellow whites" = https://poal.co/s/ModAbuse/273404/31acabf2-478e-404f-8631-52e3ab462d31#cmnts = https://archive.md/uEI3b = https://i.ibb.co/vvcj6Mg/image.png

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

When "jew" is understood to be those who have claimed the mantle of the Talmudic Pharisees, the answer is an unequivocal, no, there is no good jew. If there happens to be an isolated individual who has some blood in their veins but refuses to be a "jew", then whatever, as long as that blood hasn't been corrupted by the blood of the nephilim.

[–] 1 pt

Eh. This sounds good and I kind of agree but just with "never relax around ..." you can never be too careful when dealing with Pharisees.

Like I have some "insane" theories of my own that jews aren't only ~2% of the population. But through goyim rape and the practice of conning their sperm in sperm banks that there are far far far more jews than people even know themselves. It's a troubling thought. Maybe I'm crazy, about the idea or about the scale. But it's still a real thing I think (no actual concrete evidence of any large scale happenings of the mentioned acts).

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, I mean I guess I'd have a pretty aggressive definition for "refusing to be a 'jew'."

[–] 0 pt

I've thought about this and the minimum I can think of is cutting the tubes (I forget what the medical procedure is specifically called) so no offspring can be had. If some extreme exception jew were to rise up to some valuable asset I'm not an absolute monster who would go for any type of complete neutering or the like as that truly ruins the mind completely, which would make redundant the value part.

I dunno. Maybe I think about these odd corner cases too much.

[–] 1 pt

The jews are the literal "body of satan".

It doesn't matter if there are "some good ones". Those are the bait. Goyim won't go for the hook if the bait's no good.

[–] 0 pt

huh

Your name rang as someone I had mass-banned before so I looked. But nope. It seems you may have said some little thing in the past that caught my attention so slightly but not nearly enough to get a thread of your own. I wish personal tagging were here but these types of comments confirm my lack of jewdar triggering.

Nice to see it happen multiple times today alone.

[–] 1 pt

Well like I said, I mostly agree with your posts. Credit where it's due and all.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Your act is hilarious. You know damn well who he is. You went out of your way to make a comment in a totally unrelated thread where you accused King, myself, and a few others of being shills. You literally called him out by name in a thread that had nothing to do with him, and now you're going to sit here and pretend you don't remember who he is?

https://poal.co/s/SmokePoal/271148/86440eab-7b62-4131-a993-b58f18f1c327#cmnts

Why would you even pretend not to know?

You're a nigger.


[–] 1 pt

Lest anyone misconstrue my intentions about Anticlutch - he's clearly a whiny bitch, but he often posts accurate information. I'd hate if people thing I'm attacking his anti-kikery content.

[–] 0 pt

You know damn well who he is.

I never fucking hid that fact you schizoid faggot.

I just didn't recall specifically where or how. I'm not some lamprey-like kike who attaches himself to everyone who he is ever at odds with. It's why I have . It's literally a tracking tool because it's convenient to do so.

Though I don't know why you're so salty. Maybe you should post in .

:)

Also it's really odd you're in here defending someone else from something I said about them. Like really weird, odd, and quite suspicious. But I can't really place the suspicion so I won't because I don't give a fuck.

[–] 1 pt

They venture here and bait you into giving answers to their dumb question which they then have two more, three more.

[–] 1 pt

The sad thing is I'm so bored due to muh pandemic that I have the time to waste to take the bait despite how obvious it is.

[–] 0 pt

Not all Jews are evil. Quit being hyperbolic.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I imagine this is why you got banned from Anticlutch subs.

The point these people are making is that the jews - as a whole - are evil. Whether you know a particular jew who qualifies as "good" misses the point. The only reason a person would say "not all jews ! !" is to weaken our resolve and muddy the waters.

For example, the closest thing I can think of to a "good jew" is Brother Nathanael. He's done more good for White well-being than almost any other jew in history (exception being Jesus Christ Himself). Brother Nathanael has removed himself from the gene pool, promotes Traditional Christian morality, and makes known in great vivid detail the plans of the jew world order. I understand he's controlled opposition, but I can give credit where it's due.

Brother Nathanael never pulls the "not all jews!!" line. Because he understands he's referring to a collective, and that muddying the waters in any way defeats the purpose.

I'd recommend that, if you're sincere about the well-being of the White Race, you'll also adopt this understanding.

PS: I'm not defending Anticlutch - that guy is very often a whiny bitch, but he posts many good things. Instead I'm simply sharing a perspective. You may take or leave it as you wish.