WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://poal.co/s/Whatever/257873 = https://archive.md/0oMn0

This is fucking retarded. If you don't like Crensch's modding, make your own fucking (((quck))) sub. Do it. If he's so bad people will flock to your new one. It shouldn't be hard.

I dislike Crensch. I always have. I fuck with him when I can as can be seen in when and I figured out we could move submissions into mod only subs. We did it to fuck with . We were banned, we didn't give a fuck.

@SexMachine https://poal.co/s/Whatever/257873 = https://archive.md/0oMn0 This is fucking retarded. If you don't like Crensch's modding, make your own fucking (((quck))) sub. Do it. If he's so bad people will flock to your new one. It shouldn't be hard. I dislike Crensch. I always have. I fuck with him when I can as can be seen in /s/SoapTropeFagBagger when @ChemperGrill and I figured out we could move submissions into mod only subs. We did it to fuck with @Crensch. We were banned, we didn't give a fuck.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It's not censorship to ban someone from YOUR sub.

Just like it's not censorship for me to not allow niggers on my property.

Fuck off with the retardation.

[–] 1 pt

Squelching speech of any kind is censorship.

I don't know how you came to your abortion of logic, but you are a nigger if you think differently.

[–] 0 pt

kicking someone out of your sub is censorship

Is equal to;

kicking someone out of your property is censorship

The issue is that it's wrong. It's not censorship, it's not squelching etc.

Next we're going to see people banned for what they upvote and downvotes. The same tyranny that goes on in reddit. But you're okay because "muh free speech".

I've said it before, I'll say it again: Free Speech, while admirable, is an absolute garbage ideal to follow when the enemy will use it to subvert.

[–] 1 pt

A sub is not property -- it is a FORUM. If a sub were property, nobody would be able to post unless specifically and individually each given access (given a key to the door). 'If your ideas cannot withstand scrutiny, then they are worthless', right ?

Your issue is that you're too dumb to realize how dumb you are and refuse to stop proving it.