![[src + arch inside] [src diff than SS] DNA studies prove that jews have as much as 36% Negroid genes, and NO Israelite, Caucasian, or White genes. Other jewish sources report that jews also have Turkish, Khazarian, and Mongolian genes](https://pic8.co/sh/lddkuQ.png){kind=link}
Makes sense, they are a nomadic tribe of degenerate cannibals and pedophiles, just like niggers are.
Group of people that are generally classified as Caucasians are in reality Aryans (). Kikes are doing everything they can to hide our history from us as, it would make us realize that we are the ones who created EVERY SINGLE CIVILIZATION on the planet, including the Persian Empire, which was subverted and destroyed by jews in a similar manner our modern Civilization is being destroyed. You will notice that when in history it's inevitable to mention that Aryan people existed, they will use the kiked PC term "Indo-Europeans".
Khazarians being jews is a lie. From what I researched about this, their ruling class was subverted by kikes and decided to convert purely for political reasons, the rest of the Khazarian tribes continued to follow their original religion. This probably allowed kikes to settle and mix with them, and still most likely just their ruling class. I'm reluctant to believe even in that theory, but this would likely explain how inbred degenerate "oligarch jews" came to be in that part of Eastern Europe.
Now, jews being Israelites and Israelites being jews is another well hidden part of history, I wish I knew more about it, but this is what I managed to piece together so far. Their first claim to be Israelites and to be allowed to settle in Jerusalem starts with Persian kings allowing them to . Assuming that this is not complete jewish rewriting of the history crap (Wikipedia), I can also see kikes finding some shithole ruin and kvetching it's their long lost temple just to support their claim to the land. Don't forget that they were nomads, so obtaining a piece of land with access to Mediterranean sea in the greatest Empire in the world at the time would be of great advantage to them.
Now the part where jews were the Israelite "slaves" (they just love to claim they were slaves and forced to work, don't they?) who built the pyramids in Egypt. Can you just imagine how it would be to force jews into doing manual labor? The more you whip them the more they kvetch, after a month of that their Egyptian supervisors would sooner throw themselves into Nile to be eaten by crocodiles than to see another kike again. They are parasites, they can't build or create, not even when forced to do so.
This is what I managed to piece together, any additional input is welcome.
I think a lot of the perceived accuracy of your post depends on the understanding of the term "jew". There's a wide range of understandings with different (often exclusive) definitions. I will try to avoid it here to reduce misunderstanding.
In fact, the term "jew" seems to have originated from the rebranding the edomites gave themselves.
First, a brief history: the united kingdom of Israel broke into the northern kingdom of israel and the southern kingdom of Judah/Judea. Judea and Edom were in a perpetual low-intensity conflict and Edom basically won it by infiltrating the culture and society of Judea. That led to something else I'll mention in a minute. Then the Babylonians went in to conquer Israel and Judea. Of course the Israelites fought and were mostly killed off. Most of Judea did not, because they were really Edomites with no real cultural, social, or patriotic ties to Judea (but they didn't exactly lack religious ties - they had been converted by force and took up a perverted form of judaism aka the jewish religion). The Babylonians took the remaining people into slavery, but it was for the most part the end of the Israelites (that is, the descendants of Israel). Other nations and ethnic groups moved into the population vacuum that remained, but mostly the Edomites just grew and shifted up north through Judea and the former Israel. After Persia conquered Babylon, they quickly got fed up with the "Judean" kvetching and told them to get back to the land they claimed and leave them alone. The "Judeans" (really non-Israelite Edomite displacers) went back and took over the choice land up north in and around Jerusalem.
There's a lot more detail in there, like the Babylonians spreading them around the kingdom to integrate them and make them not want to rebel, and them refusing to integrate just like we continue to see through history.
Oh and that other thing. King Manasseh of Israel reverted to devil-worship in a huge way. He re-established Baal worship, defiled the temple with the likeness of Asherah, built altars to the stars in front of the temple, and sacrificed his own son to Moloch. As one might expect, God cursed him and with him all of Israel (who followed him into depravity), saying "I will forsake the remnant of my inheritance". In my understanding, that is where the Israelites as we understand them ended, and they were no longer the chosen people of God. Anything left is just a hollow echo or pretending imposters, at least until Christ came to give a measure of mercy.
That's interesting new info, thank you for taking you time to share it.
israel was never a jewish nation. Ever in history. It was always a Christian nation until sandjew invasions and then (((the treaty of versailles))) none of your post is worth reading when you start with that trash.
jews aren't israelites BTW.
israel was never a jewish nation. Ever in history. It was always a Christian nation until sandjew invasions and then (((the treaty of versailles))) none of your post is worth reading when you start with that trash.
I was talking about before Christ. And I did talk about one of the invasions.
jews aren't israelites BTW.
That's basically what I said.
Are you sure you replied to the right post?
Worth looking into Carthage, phonecia and the Canaanites as the protojews. Carthage was an ancient superpower rival to Rome that worshipped Baal hamon, who was synonymous with (satan?). They waged war with Rome for supremacy of the Mediterranean sea and their success was a serious prospect. Their army wasn't fought by Canaanite warriors because they didn't fight their own battles but rather with mercenaries in typical jewish fashion. They lost every war with Rome, the first 2 times they lost Rome was lenient and demanded only a tithe and cease to military operations, the third time however Rome razed Carthage completely and salted the earth so that nothing could remain.
This was roughly 200 years BC, in that time the elders and survivors fled somewhere, and it is my belief that they went to Jerusalem and were accepted by the Israelites on condition of converting to Christianity. In this context the narrative of the new testament where the Pharisee elders were turning the Israelites away from god's teachings makes more sense as they were Canaanite jews following their elders teachings (Baal hamon, shabbatai, Saturn), Jesus ministry was about exposing them, the consequence was the Pharisees executing Christ.
Christianity became a big part of Israel at the time, and I believe when Hadrian sacked Jerusalem he allowed the Christians to flee before wiping out the Canaanites entirely. The 'jews' hatred of Rome endured and they began undermining Rome with rebellions and proxy wars before Rome wiped Jerusalem off the face of the planet. Hadrian took 12 legions to deal with Jerusalem, they only took 4 to subjugate all of Gaul. He wanted nothing more than the complete destruction of his ancient foe.
As for the jewish Saturn connection look into it it just keeps unraveling. jews worship on Saturday (Saturn's day) or shabbat, which is also Saturn's day in their belief (shabbatai is the name for the god Saturn). What many people call 'baal' as the Canaanite god is actually baal hamon, Baal just means lord in Canaanite language, Baal hamon is synonymous with saturn. The word cannibal I believe comes from Canaan and Baal, or literally a Canaanite lord.
This is something I'm just reading into and discovering so forgive me if I'm loose on details.
Interesting info, but I think jews worshiping Saturn might be misleading. The picture of Saturn you shared is actually a picture of Greek Titan . Easiest way to explain Titans in Greek mythology would be "the evil gods", and for some reason (most likely political with little afterthought) Romans did this:
After the Roman conquest of Greece, he was conflated with the Greek Titan Cronus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_(mythology)
I find it also unlikely that jews who are Africans would worship European pagan God. I'd stick with them worshipping Moloch, Baal and similar degenerate African deities.
Saturn is the equivalent to cronos. There is a deeper connection than just that. Saturn is still a planet regardless of mythology and was observable. The jews call it shabbatai and there is reverence for it. Romans consider it a malignant entity while the jews revere it. There is probably interconnection between them tbh, the ancient world wasn't isolated islands of cultures that in spite of what we're led to believe, there was a lot of connection between them and the more you learn the more you see it.
Regardless of connection to European history they do worship Saturn regardless as the Canaanites worshipped Baal hamon or as shabbatai. It's worth looking into the jews worship of Saturn, there is something there and I think the European disdain of it is connected to the jews reverence of it
Khazarians being jews is a lie. From what I researched about this, their ruling class was subverted by kikes and decided to convert purely for political reasons..
Kind of like muslim empires, as the house of saud in it's entirety is jewish.
jews being israelites ... kings allowing temple ...
Problem is jews only "have" a claim to a single, small hill named zion. https://pic8.co/sh/XuesHi.jpg In which it even states that jews aren't israelites and vice versa.
Now the part where jews were the Israelite "slaves"
Judeans - Whites, were the slaves. It stems from the (((intentional))) mistranslation of Judean to jew. I believe IIRC it's an incorrect translation of Ancient Greek.
Taking all this and the DNA studies into account, I'd say that the most likely place of origin for the jews is North Africa, and they have no claim to any land as they were basically landless nomadic gypsies.
North Africa
I 100% disagree because that pushes the known lie that jews had anything to do with or were in any way slaves in Egypt, which they weren't.
My understanding is that it's finally widely accepted that the pyramids were built by skilled laborers well-compensated for their work, and not enslaved jews. There's just too much skill and knowledge required to have put them together for slaves to have done it (not to even mention your other points).
Yes, I was planning to mention that, but forgot.
I remember reading years back that they found records of wages being paid to people working on pyramids, and also records of letters that were circulating the lands around Egypt calling all skilled builders to come and work on the project, offering generous wages along with accommodation and food covered for them and their families.
Find a job like that today, I dare you.
You are correct. The workers who built the pyramids were paid for their labor. They were Egyptians, not foreign slaves.
They were Egyptians
So Europeans*
German Jews interbred with white Christians for centuries. All you need to do is look at them to realize this. Many German Jews have blue eyes and blond hair. Those characteristics come from Caucasians.
(post is archived)