Oh, so this judge with a law degree is suddenly a biologist then? How interesting that happens when it suits them but not when you put a camera in their face and ask "What is a woman"?
>there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
It seems to me that once a judge starts interjecting testimony and opinion the trial should be stopped. Is there not supposed to be some sort of impartiality in the courts?
I would suggest that anyone that stupid should be recused from any descision making For anyonee other than themselves.
I'm not entirely sure this person should even be making her own decisions!
I meant things like: "should I eat breakfast?" "Shoes or sanals?" "Do I wamt soup with lunch?" You know, the deep stuff
(post is archived)