WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Bullshit article. Radioactive isotopes released into the ocean do not change weather patterns. The sun does.

What we do need to do is monitor seafood for radiation if it came from that area for a few years, although the risk is pretty slim imo.

Fun fact, there are over 350,000,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water in the earth's oceans. That's 350 quintillion gallons of water. The amount of radioactivity released from Fukushima is completely irrelevant with those numbers. Pretending California is in danger from Fukushima is like putting a drop of red food coloring in a large, deep lake and expecting it to turn blood red.

[–] 1 pt

Don't tell OP about how nuclear subs and aircraft carriers discharge primary water on occasion to immeasurably small impact since 1950s

[–] 1 pt

What's primary water?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Possible, Jeff Rense does push the conspiracy envelope but he's pretty entertaining at an Art Bell level, that is. As far as the truth though, I don't know what it is but since humans have been building and detonating nuclear weapons since the 1940's and fucking up nuclear plants since - I think the '70's - Three Mile Island, I suspect radiation is doing us more harm than good.

Otoh, talking about how many bazillions of gallons of water the oceans has is sort of moot. I mean, while not radiation, glyphosate- another man made problem is in the hydrologic cycle. It fucking rains glyphosate.

Just sayin'.

[–] 1 pt

I read the article, know about radioactive isotopes, and their claims that radioactive water is magically creating storms hitting California is total bullshit. Radioactive isotopes don't evaporate into the clouds. They stay in the water, and have zero effect on storm systems.