![Not breastfeeding is bad enough but throwing soy into the equation is rather insane. [474x533 - 53KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/9xKwrN.jpg){kind=link}
Those stats I don't doubt in the least. Did a quick dive into just labor induction stats and that is rather concerning. Around 20% of all births.
Those stats I don't doubt in the least. Did a quick dive into just labor induction stats and that is rather concerning. Around 20% of all births.
They have a check that they perform that "isn't intended to induce" but its a possibility. Don't remember the name. They did that to someone I know, they were induced but technically they were not. So at a minimum that number is low.
Ask an ob gyn what their c section rate is and watch them stumble, "I'll have to check that for you" you fuckers know damn well what it is.
Home births are the way to go.
They have a check that they perform that "isn't intended to induce" but its a possibility. Don't remember the name. They did that to someone I know, they were induced but technically they were not. So at a minimum that number is low.
Ask an ob gyn what their c section rate is and watch them stumble, "I'll have to check that for you" you fuckers know damn well what it is.
Home births are the way to go.
Did a quick dive into just labor induction stats and that is rather concerning. Around 20% of all births.
Yet (((their))) own stats also say only 3% of births require induction of any kind.
>Did a quick dive into just labor induction stats and that is rather concerning. Around 20% of all births.
Yet (((their))) own stats also say only 3% of births require induction of any kind.
(post is archived)