Then, as a property owner, do it anyway, and don’t tell anyone.
You'd just get sued by some uppity nigger.
Shouldn't be renting to niggers in the first place, regardless of criminal background.
Oakland is literally nothing but criminal niggers now, better to sell and put the money into something valid.
Not that anybody would buy to be clear.
True, if the mouth-nig can figure out why he was really declined, which of course will never be stated. A substitute reason is required (remodeling, already leased/current tenants extended, awaiting rezoning approval, property tax dispute, etc.).
Just make up some fucking excuse that’s over the nig’s head anyway. The only requirement is that it has to discoverable (i.e., can’t be created out of nothing.). Stuff involving disputes with current tenant may work for this, or maybe a “dispute” with a friendly neighbor over property lines or trash pickup or whatever.
There are lots of ways to keep mouth-nigs the fuck out of the neighborhood.
It's literally a nigger infested gang land that even if the new tenant wasn't convicted of a crime the tenant has (obviously) committed many. Almost all of which were violent felonies.
The reason that I put this in is because the far left city council thinks that they can mandate an outcome when what will really happen is that all of the current property owners will sell at a loss and take their capital elsewhere.
There are lots of ways to keep mouth-nigs the fuck out of the neighborhood.
Hard to do when 1/3 of the neighborhood is nothing but porch monkeys and the ptb want them to have free access to your shit. https://pic8.co/sh/9IIrxi.png
(post is archived)