This is why (((laws)) like "threats of violence" are applied jewishly when the "threat" is made against a (((politician))). Just like it's virtually impossible to slander or libel a public figure or politician so is it virtually impossible to threaten them.
NOTE: I do not condone violence or threats of violence in any form. I am merely making a comment about the inadequacies and overreach of the US (non)law. I fully understand this area of the law and how it works, which is the main problem. Also she's not a US citizen and is not protected by either of US law or US jurisdiction by any means whatsoever.
Also of note, criminal law is by definition a threat of violence. Triple play: Consent of the Governed has been lost world over.
This is why (((laws)) like "threats of violence" are applied jewishly when the "threat" is made against a (((politician))).
Just like it's virtually impossible to slander or libel a public figure or politician so is it virtually impossible to threaten them.
NOTE: I do not condone violence or threats of violence in any form. I am merely making a comment about the inadequacies and overreach of the US (non)law. I fully understand this area of the law and how it works, which is the main problem. Also she's not a US citizen and is not protected by either of US law or US jurisdiction by any means whatsoever.
Also of note, criminal law is by definition a threat of violence.
Triple play: Consent of the Governed has been lost world over.
(post is archived)