I knew it was fake I could tell by the pixels.
What if they paid a bit more for the fancy high-grade pixels though?
The angle of the camera view is off
On costs more I bet.
I was wondering what the camera operator was standing on. The shot was far to steady for a selfie-stick.
^ This. It's a decent edit but the camera angle gives it away.
It's like an election ..
Dadadun dun dun another one bites the dust, yes it is most likely fake, but still.
While I'm not a civil engineer, I do know that a concrete retaining wall at that slope would need to be hella-thick to prevent ground movement from destroying it. Such a wall would be sloped at a significant angle in order to prevent water from making the soil breach the wall by pushing out the base. The base would also be much thicker than the top of the wall because of the huge forces the ground exerts on it due to gravity. I already don't trust anything I see in video but this one just stands out as faker than usual for me.
The perspective doesn't make any sense at all, that would be a 40 or 50 degree slope if it existed.
(post is archived)