Abortions vs Vax vs NPCs | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

This is almost poetic in it's irony. The body an abortionist kills is not her own, but an innocent baby. Yet it's "her body her choice"? However, when it comes to someone else's body, they don't have the right to determine exactly what they PUT IN their body. Some group of unaccountable people who have never met you has the right to determine what they want to put in your body. This is how I know we are living in a tyranny.

This is nothing new. About 15 years ago Abortionists argued that Anti-Abortionists were hypocrites for being for Capital Punishment but against Abortion, but that quickly stopped because the counter argument to that was that Abortionists were doing the same thing to a baby that convicted serial killers and child murderers get a death sentence for. They had to realize that they were as bad as a serial killer.

In a normal society we would kill baby murderers. In our society we hold rallies in support of baby murder.

The other irony is that if a woman kills her own baby, that's okay, but if someone else kills that baby inside her then that's murder. Same result. The baby dies. One is good and the other is evil. Why is it okay for a woman and an abortion doctor to kill her baby, but not a stranger? What's the difference morally?

I understand the Abortionist logic though. What is wrong with lynching a killer? If a group of people all agree that killing someone is in the best interest of the community then why is it wrong to kill that person? That is mob rule. Lynching in the south were motivated by the problem of what to do with a rapist or murderer (that usually but not always, happen to be Black). Why is it wrong to hang the killer if he poses a threat to the community? I actually believe that it is okay to execute the killer because the threat he poses is too great to allow him to live. Am I as bad as an Abortionist? I actually wrestle with this moral dilemma. This also brings up the problem of the "Believe All Women" movement. The accusers in those lynchings were typically women who accused Black men of raping them. Experience would agree that the vast majority of the time it was true and we should believe all women,

This is called subjective or relative morality.

This is almost poetic in it's irony. The body an abortionist kills is not her own, but an innocent baby. Yet it's "her body her choice"? However, when it comes to someone else's body, they don't have the right to determine exactly what they PUT IN their body. Some group of unaccountable people who have never met you has the right to determine what they want to put in your body. This is how I know we are living in a tyranny. This is nothing new. About 15 years ago Abortionists argued that Anti-Abortionists were hypocrites for being for Capital Punishment but against Abortion, but that quickly stopped because the counter argument to that was that Abortionists were doing the same thing to a baby that convicted serial killers and child murderers get a death sentence for. They had to realize that they were as bad as a serial killer. In a normal society we would kill baby murderers. In our society we hold rallies in support of baby murder. The other irony is that if a woman kills her own baby, that's okay, but if someone else kills that baby inside her then that's murder. Same result. The baby dies. One is good and the other is evil. Why is it okay for a woman and an abortion doctor to kill her baby, but not a stranger? What's the difference morally? I understand the Abortionist logic though. What is wrong with lynching a killer? If a group of people all agree that killing someone is in the best interest of the community then why is it wrong to kill that person? That is mob rule. Lynching in the south were motivated by the problem of what to do with a rapist or murderer (that usually but not always, happen to be Black). Why is it wrong to hang the killer if he poses a threat to the community? I actually believe that it is okay to execute the killer because the threat he poses is too great to allow him to live. Am I as bad as an Abortionist? I actually wrestle with this moral dilemma. This also brings up the problem of the "Believe All Women" movement. The accusers in those lynchings were typically women who accused Black men of raping them. Experience would agree that the vast majority of the time it was true and we should believe all women, This is called subjective or relative morality.

link

[–] • 0 pt

Good, well thought out reply. Thank you for it.

parent
link