That was the one about a private street that allowed public access? I was really surprised that all of these "social media" companies were never massively sued because of this precedent.
That was the one about a private street that allowed public access? I was really surprised that all of these "social media" companies were never massively sued because of this precedent.
What precedent?
Oh fine
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the US Supreme Court, which ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk even though the sidewalk was part of a privately-owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
What precedent?
Oh fine
> Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the US Supreme Court, which ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk even though the sidewalk was part of a privately-owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
(post is archived)