Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 13 pts

If you're watching ai generated kiddie porn you should be racked drawn and quartered.

The fact that there is even a market for porn with children is disgusting, but making it with ai instead of real children only makes it more acceptable to the depraved, whom we should execute in bulk.

[–] • 5 pts

This post is in s/insanity for exactly this reason.

Pedos get the rope.

[–] • 1 pt

All pedos need to be rounded up and given an iron clasp around their neck permanently so they walk around in shame until their neck eventually gives out under the weight.

[–] • 3 pts

even if the premise worked from what he said in order to create an AI to do such a thing the amount of content that would need to be fed into it would be ridiculous, and that content would not be without harm to children

[–] • 2 pts

Where as, the only content I want to feed in this scenario is the content of the pedophile portion of the sex abuse registry straight into a wood chipper.

[–] • 1 pt

Most of those videos are homemade though. This post makes it seem like most pedo videos are because of slaves. A friend told me he did some research on it.

[–] • 0 pt

Are they thought? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to be produced by the likes of Epstein, who have access to many victims.

[–] • 0 pt

That just isn't true. You could easily have an AI convert adult porn into kiddie porn using deep fakes.

[–] • 0 pt

To create an AI that even does this would require massive databases of jew child porn. Only a jew would suggest this.

[–] • 5 pts

Now do the same with drugs... idiots

[–] • 1 pt

The drugs would probably work.

[–] • 0 pt

doubt. more drugs more druggies, worse druggies more drug induced crime more poverty from drug addled nutcases. Havent they effectively decriminalized drugs in california and they have whole roads loaded with junkies?

[–] • 1 pt

Spend the jail money on rehabs or just give them enough drugs to kill themselves. So much of our taxes are used to house druggie s in prison.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Even if heroin was sold at the grocery with alcohol and tobacco you would still get roughly the same number of people injecting themselves. Just because you can access all the alcohol you want doesn't mean you'll become alcoholic, same deal, not everybody is capable of becoming alcoholic or go for heroin injection

I don't think the number of alcoholics suddenly exploded just because the prohibition era ended

https://vinepair.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/chart2.png

https://ahauk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/image.png

[–] • 0 pt

They also give them a shit ton of welfare to enable that lifestyle.

[–] • 0 pt

Decriminalization of drugs has lead to reduced drug use in Spain. While the war on drugs has lead to drug cartels powerful enough to overthrow governments like in Mexico. Massive bloodshed, career criminals, and lifestyles that lead to crime and destruction.

[–] • 0 pt

Sure, tell me how it is working in Seattle and Portland? Decriminalizing drugs is a farce. You seriously think the cartels and their corrupt govt officials are just going to give up on their cash cows?

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing in this requires drug cartels to give up on anything. What exactly is your thought process here?

Opening market to competition naturally takes away the cartles power and money, whether they like it or not. Weed especially can be grown by individuals for thier own use. There is nothing the cartels can do about that. Unless they use policing to enforce thier monopoly by forbidding people from growing thier own, which is literally what the government is doing right now.

[–] • 2 pts

some genius needs to create a worm that gets through every system on the internet and replaces child porn with rick astley.

[–] • 2 pts

or the best way is a bullet to the head after swift judgement to anyone seeking child pornography?

[–] • 0 pt

?

Was this really necessary?

[–] • 0 pt

I dont live in affirmations. everything has a possibility for debate and exchange. some say a knife to the balls if a better punishment, others more drastic ideas. yes, the "?" is necessary.

[–] • 2 pts

Killing the clients kills the demand.

[–] • 1 pt

Unfortunately the people paying for it are wealthy and powerful. A sting in the 90's took over a kiddie porn site and collected credit card info. They then traced the credit cards back to the owners. Thousands lead back to the pentagon. The investigation was stopped.

[–] • 1 pt

It's a human condition, more people born in the future would also do it.

[–] • 0 pt

Eventually all those shitty ((( genes ))) will be eliminated from society.

[–] • 1 pt

What does the research say?

I remember a study from Spain, from one of my criminology classes, that said this type of "trick" doesn't work and it increases likelihood for real world offense because it is like drugs and they keep escalating until they target real kids.

It's part of why porn, in general, is toxic. You have to keep your mind clean.

[–] • 1 pt

Aella Girl. I'm pretty sure she's that reddit gonewild thot who did the gnome joke photoshoots something like 10 years ago. The e-girl lifestyle clearly hasn't helped her cognitive abilities.

Illegal markets don't work that way. People trade that shit freely.

And I'm pretty sure that feeding pedo's urges will inevitably cause more harm to kids.

[–] • 1 pt

But... whether generated or reality, anything sexual with children deserves the firing squad, the rope, or the helicopter.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

There's more free porn available online than you could watch in a lifetime, yet somehow people are still making a living as porn actors and directors.

Demand for porn is insatiable.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It has copy right attached to it. Media "owners" can't make money without copyright because you don't own it if everyone owns it. Ignoring tube sites for a bit, people pay for it instead of torrent it because it's worth it to them to not deal with the rather small risk of torrenting it. Adding tube sites back into the mix, the flow of money still depends on ownership because what's to stop a site from distributing the full films with zero ads for free, and delivering it for free over something like ipfs, thus undercutting companies like pornhub? Because the site owner would run the risk of getting in trouble with the law for distributing it without permission. Thus these sites have licensing costs and thus need ads.

The point is demand in media doesn't work the same as for physical goods without the government getting involved. The ever so slight risk applied to non-paying parties and distributors is what makes companies like Disney money. Media doesn't make money without blood. True of news too, but they produce blood a different way. They just lie to people until it causes death and destruction, and get paid for the associated fluff and hit pieces. Either way, you cannot make money off of media honestly and usually thanks to the government being involved.

[–] • 0 pt

How about we bring back the Blood Eagle and just eliminate demand?

[–] • 0 pt

Afterthe pedo is pumped full of AI images, he/she/zhe acts it out on REAL children. No harm?

Load more (10 replies)