WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

487

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I believe this technique requires blood. I think there is a non invasive way to do this by exploiting the graphene properties. I imagine graphene in your body will alter induction coils by a few micro henrys, enough to detect it. Since we only need to detect it a few inches deep, I can get away with a very small coil and very small gauge of wire and a small current. My biggest problem is I'll need vaccinated people to test this with. Knowing how scared these people are, I'm not sure if they'd be willing to help.

[–] 2 pts

They would have to admit that there was graphene in the "vax" if they made a test that functioned like that. Never gonna happen.

It also says in the article that it is a serology test so yes, they need a blood sample.

[–] 0 pt

Good point. The minute such a test came out would reveal the lie. However, lies don't seem to matter anymore. We live in the looking glass now. Lies are perfectly normal.