Neat, another test I'm not taking.
Neat, another test I'm not taking.
The title of the article is misleading. The test reveals the presence of antibodies be it naturally from a previous infection or the shot. It is not detecting graphene or a signature left by the vax. It is testing immunity...not wether you’ve had the shot. We have the ability to do that now through testing the specific igA, iGg, iGm antibodies for c19. The test is in use right now under an EUA. It is not recommended by the CDC for obvious reasons, those vaccinated show waning immunity after 2 months. That’s why they don’t want these tests used to determine immunity. It shows the vax is worthless. This is what I do for a living.
The title of the article is misleading. The test reveals the presence of antibodies be it naturally from a previous infection or the shot. It is not detecting graphene or a signature left by the vax. It is testing immunity...not wether you’ve had the shot. We have the ability to do that now through testing the specific igA, iGg, iGm antibodies for c19. The test is in use right now under an EUA. It is not recommended by the CDC for obvious reasons, those vaccinated show waning immunity after 2 months. That’s why they don’t want these tests used to determine immunity. It shows the vax is worthless. This is what I do for a living.
I had thought that myself until:
The technology to date has resulted in four different tests, one of which has the potential to distinguish the immune response of COVID-19 infected individuals from vaccinated individuals.
This is something entirely new.
I had thought that myself until:
>The technology to date has resulted in four different tests, one of which has the potential to distinguish the immune response of COVID-19 infected individuals from vaccinated individuals.
This is something entirely new.
That would be interesting.
That would be interesting.
Shieeeettt like i gib a fok
Shieeeettt like i gib a fok
I believe this technique requires blood. I think there is a non invasive way to do this by exploiting the graphene properties. I imagine graphene in your body will alter induction coils by a few micro henrys, enough to detect it. Since we only need to detect it a few inches deep, I can get away with a very small coil and very small gauge of wire and a small current. My biggest problem is I'll need vaccinated people to test this with. Knowing how scared these people are, I'm not sure if they'd be willing to help.
I believe this technique requires blood. I think there is a non invasive way to do this by exploiting the graphene properties. I imagine graphene in your body will alter induction coils by a few micro henrys, enough to detect it. Since we only need to detect it a few inches deep, I can get away with a very small coil and very small gauge of wire and a small current. My biggest problem is I'll need vaccinated people to test this with. Knowing how scared these people are, I'm not sure if they'd be willing to help.
They would have to admit that there was graphene in the "vax" if they made a test that functioned like that. Never gonna happen.
It also says in the article that it is a serology test so yes, they need a blood sample.
They would have to admit that there was graphene in the "vax" if they made a test that functioned like that. Never gonna happen.
It also says in the article that it is a serology test so yes, they need a blood sample.
Good point. The minute such a test came out would reveal the lie. However, lies don't seem to matter anymore. We live in the looking glass now. Lies are perfectly normal.
Good point. The minute such a test came out would reveal the lie. However, lies don't seem to matter anymore. We live in the looking glass now. Lies are perfectly normal.
I'm not afraid of just saying so. Not sure why this needed a new thing.
The test effectively checks for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies developed either in response to a COVID-19 infection or to a vaccine
The (((vax))) doesn't cause the body to produce antibodies. This is known.
I'm not afraid of just saying so.
Not sure why this needed a new thing.
>The test effectively checks for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies developed either in response to a COVID-19 infection or to a vaccine
The (((vax))) doesn't cause the body to produce antibodies. This is known.
This is why no unvaccinated individual should be upset about the lax laws regarding shoplifting and looting. Although I suspect it will lead to the implementation of this: https://youtu.be/k3Fdox5_rg4
This is why no unvaccinated individual should be upset about the lax laws regarding shoplifting and looting. Although I suspect it will lead to the implementation of this: https://youtu.be/k3Fdox5_rg4
There are regions of the world still with large numbers of unvaxxed people. Even in the US, the raw number of people unvaxxed is in the millions.
There are regions of the world still with large numbers of unvaxxed people. Even in the US, the raw number of people unvaxxed is in the millions.
I think bluetooth has already been invented?
I think bluetooth has already been invented?
It seems to test for natural immunity too. Damn I was hoping it was a pureblood test alone so there would be a way to see if someone was stupid enough to get the jab.
It seems to test for natural immunity too. Damn I was hoping it was a pureblood test alone so there would be a way to see if someone was stupid enough to get the jab.
Well this is evil.
Well this is evil.
(post is archived)