Well he was a philosophy professor. What would you expect?
If you want a real education, study a hard science (heavy in math). Still that's no guarantee but this world is full of calculated risks. He would understand how to calculate them better if he didn't fritter away his time with subjective nonsense like philosophy.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/math-association-say-math-inherently-carries-human-biases-citing-critical-race-theory https://nypost.com/2021/02/12/adding-wokeness-oregon-promotes-teacher-program-to-subtract-racism-in-mathematics/ https://summit.news/2021/02/19/bill-gates-bankrolling-educational-organization-that-says-math-is-racist/
Heavy in math, you say?
JK, you are correct, of course. I think his brand of philosophy is the good kind. There's value in philosophy, it just has become a playground of professional masturbators. I recommend Kant and his https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_Pure_Reason (en.wikipedia.org)
(post is archived)