WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Red Ice TV news September 18th, 2021 : https://www.bitchute.com/video/XUxVQjKFeVXD/

archived : https://files.catbox.moe/ntycts.mp4

Sweden NEVER actually , after prison, deports criminals if muslim illegals , if any time served. NEVER deports.

Red Ice TV news September 18th, 2021 : https://www.bitchute.com/video/XUxVQjKFeVXD/ archived : https://files.catbox.moe/ntycts.mp4 Sweden NEVER actually , after prison, deports criminals if muslim illegals , if any time served. NEVER deports.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Under US free speech law, it is more secure to include a entire class, not a subclass, according to SCOTUS.

So you would type : "ALL prosecutors need to die", the entire class of targets, to eliminate one component of a public call for "imminent lawless action"

The other REQUIRED component is a date of the event UNDER 365 days, not including 365 days from now.

You omitted a time, so therefore your speech is legal, despite it being a bit "glowie"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

Summary: If either criteria missing (time and subclass of target(s) ), or both criteria missing, it is free speech protected by US Supreme Court in all 50 states.

regardless of free speech or not, some so-called free speech sites are not as free-speech leaning as one might hope, so maybe you better add "...in minecraft"

Also, a side topic, though SCOTUS never ruled on validity, a short handful of elected officials , PRIOR to Trump election in 2016, are considered special and not able to be publicly threatened , including all federal district judges. But after 2016, thousands of Democrats freely issued death threats onto Trump without consequences including Kathy Griffin, so the statutes might not pass muster under SCOTUS for federal judges if Trump was fair game, though US has 22 curtailed exemptions to free speech:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions

kathy griffin and other presidents : https://files.catbox.moe/7ep25e.jpg

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I did not specify a particular individual, and I did not state how they should die. Legal tribunal or simply old age will suffice. Note I did not call for violence against a specific individual, nor did I even call for anything other than the hand of God. If I stated they all should die means I am calling direct action against any and all that belong to that class, and that could be considered a direct threat, which I did not do, I only made an observation and stated such opinion.