CLOWN WORLD! Sweden's Jewish controlled courts! : Young White Man brutally raped with glass bottle for 6 hours by gang of illegal aliens. Now WHITE VICTIM BEING CHARGED with "incitement to hate and violence against illegal alien muslims" for calling his attackers mean names after being raped!

[–] • 7 pts

This shit it starting to happen in us courts. It needs to be niped in the bud.

link

[–] • 3 pts

This shit is just so hard to hear. It is very upsetting and makes you want it all to explode now but on the other hand it feels like it will never happen and have no idea what to do to actually stop these people. They hold all the power. They are in charge and make the rules. They are the so called judges that feel like this is justice to charge the victim. They are the officers that have the audacity to enforce these injustices on victims.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

These people all sleep somewhere. Soon, the hunts will begin.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

We stand united

parent
link

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts

[–] • 5 pts

Some prosecutors and judges need to die.

link

[–] • 4 pts

(edited )

Under US free speech law, it is more secure to include a entire class, not a subclass, according to SCOTUS.

So you would type : "ALL prosecutors need to die", the entire class of targets, to eliminate one component of a public call for "imminent lawless action"

The other REQUIRED component is a date of the event UNDER 365 days, not including 365 days from now.

You omitted a time, so therefore your speech is legal, despite it being a bit "glowie"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

Summary: If either criteria missing (time and subclass of target(s) ), or both criteria missing, it is free speech protected by US Supreme Court in all 50 states.

regardless of free speech or not, some so-called free speech sites are not as free-speech leaning as one might hope, so maybe you better add "...in minecraft"

Also, a side topic, though SCOTUS never ruled on validity, a short handful of elected officials , PRIOR to Trump election in 2016, are considered special and not able to be publicly threatened , including all federal district judges. But after 2016, thousands of Democrats freely issued death threats onto Trump without consequences including Kathy Griffin, so the statutes might not pass muster under SCOTUS for federal judges if Trump was fair game, though US has 22 curtailed exemptions to free speech:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions

kathy griffin and other presidents : https://files.catbox.moe/7ep25e.jpg

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

I did not specify a particular individual, and I did not state how they should die. Legal tribunal or simply old age will suffice. Note I did not call for violence against a specific individual, nor did I even call for anything other than the hand of God. If I stated they all should die means I am calling direct action against any and all that belong to that class, and that could be considered a direct threat, which I did not do, I only made an observation and stated such opinion.

parent
link

[–] • 4 pts

Why are all muslim men so gay

link

[–] • 3 pts

they're raped as boys, then killed for being faggots when they become men

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Though a bit philosophical... "raping boys is how gays reproduce".

think about it.

Sure, part of the latent drive may have been already in the kid from chemicals in womb, but the adult homos finish the job. They flip the kids all-gay.