WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

342

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Remington is stupid for paying out any amount, unless they pulled the trigger, which I'm pretty sure they didn't. Let's sue every auto-maker whose vehicle was ever involved in a deadly crash while we're at it. Or perhaps those that make cutlery can be sued by those that stuff their mouths and die from obesity.

Fukkin clown world meets upside-down world. Ugh.

[–] 1 pt

remington isnt remington any longer. I kind of think this was a setup to establish 'case law', or whatever they call it.

[–] 1 pt

You're probably right. Either they folded on purpose (setup as you claimed), or they hired some shitty lawyers and drew an even shittier progressive commie judge.

[–] 1 pt

That is the bad thing because this is exactly what is now established. Can it be applied across the board though? Liked in a drunk driving accident? Car manufacturer and alcohol producer liable. But what about everything getting involved? The distributor? The retailer? I mean they all profited from the evil an be are complicit as well, right? So personal responsibility is no longer a thing?