Maybe England is right about banning coverage of active cases. I don't think that's quite right, but clearly both ends produce bad results. Maybe something in the middle produces both bad results. What to do, IDK.
England's system had us livid over banning coverage of muslim rape gangs, so clearly we want coverage.
This will just make his appeal that much easier.
The jury system is fine as long as it is actual peers. White and moral men. Anything less is a farce.
(post is archived)