Dangerous speech, hate speech, hate crimes and so on don't actually exist, any more than the Hall of Cost exists, except as an abstract concept designed to coerce you.
Fighting back means to simply ignore these abstract ideas since they don't exist.
The article mentions that these concepts get promoted by private individuals, then pushed by NGOs, later picked up by too big to exist corporations and finally codified into law. When you look back at the individuals who start these ideas, guess who they always are? Yes, the same people who brought us the idea of the Hall of cost, hate crimes, hate speech, black lives matter, etc.
Dangerous speech, hate speech, hate crimes and so on don't actually exist, any more than the Hall of Cost exists, except as an abstract concept designed to coerce you.
Fighting back means to simply ignore these abstract ideas since they don't exist.
The article mentions that these concepts get promoted by private individuals, then pushed by NGOs, later picked up by too big to exist corporations and finally codified into law. When you look back at the individuals who start these ideas, guess who they always are? Yes, the same people who brought us the idea of the Hall of cost, hate crimes, hate speech, black lives matter, etc.
Well said.
Well said.
(post is archived)