in a fun, effective, open system

You try to use "wants" to incentivize the selfish to comprehend their "needs"...that's what the happy merchant does. Control by deception.

Your friend is a chain-smoker who smokes a pack a day.
Do you recommend he goes cold turkey? Or maybe try a week at half-a-pack per day first?

And regarding this same example, the point being to create a form of 'interactive entertainment' for others to enjoy; like a book or a videogame or a movie can do the same and even inspire people as much as it can also be a source of ignorance; of course in the end it is just fiction. There are (((movies))) that have negative intent and movies that were created with positive intent. Just as a book, a game, or a 'money alternative' can be created with either intent.

Furthermore, if you are open with your intent while you create it perhaps you may also inspire & attract others to your ecoysystem. You say yourself that the highest value of ONE is ONE's ability to evaluate ALL. Perhaps I value the creation process of something unique that can be engaged in by those seeking entertainment - whatever their intent; be it selfishness or boredrom or perhaps as a misguided notion that they can get what they need out of this creation - whatever the case, the intended result is that they become inspired and perhaps can learn from the experience. It is therefor up to the creator to deliver an impact; to help leave a lasting impression. One that doesnt' exert authority or proclaim but that inspires - maybe the kind of very inspiration you share here on Poal. To get people's gears grinding and pondering on our selfish destructive nature. So that maybe perhaps they will eventually realize they do not need the game, the movie, the system - to get what they need. Or do you see no value in this exercise?

Do you need to play cards with your friends or do you want to play cards with your friends...

If you don't play cards with friends, you may end up not having any friends - therefore if you want friends depending on the type of friends they are then sure, you need to play cards with your friends.

Do you suggest tending to the fields 15 hours a day, 7 days a week? Surely at some point you willl have what you need - for both you and your family, maybe even for your local community too. At what point do you 'stop and smell the roses' or shoot the shit with some pals?

Crypto (crypt) means I'm inside the (digital) van with the pedophiles who can fuck me whenever they want, because I can't get out....I'm now inside their digital crypt. They now have no need for incentives anymore, because they will make digital fiction mandatory, while using our self imprisonment to take access to physical reality away from us. They now want me to play along to gain access to the outside.

Good call - and we can also see the early stage unfolding with access/restriction to travel/international flights that will soon require the 'Covidpass' or whatever digital ID/credit/crypt/idolotry point system they are rolling out next.

The question always remains however, to what end? You effectively & consistently sumrise it in a big picture way - ie; endless conflict and distraction amongst the goy to keep them fighting amonst each other and to ensure they remain ignorant to their own individual power - for the benefit of endless control. Yet it would be nice to get more specific. And to maybe understand if at some point the parasites will not have 'enough'? Or will they stop at nothing short of destruction of all civizliations until reaching their 'one world' ? Can we really stop it by simply just 'not playing along'?

the one which is based on an open source irreversible ledger... seems far better than 18th century version based on paper ...no?

Who is offering? (they) and who consents? (you). Did anything change that foundation? No? Then the consequences of that action will always be the same (against you and for them).

Disagree to some extent here. The foundation is based on open technology and auditable ledger that is near impossible to modify. In the case of both the internet and cryptocurrency you seem to imply military industrialists/Rothschild financing of the development and that may very well be the case but without direct evidence such an implication is merely a belief, no? Are you not engaging in idolotry by beliving in the all powerful East India Company who creates all grand innovations, and that none of us lowly goy have the capability on our own to advance such things? Of course, it may be a combination thereof - as the two technologies are made possible by the likes of intelligent people who are personally engaged by the work & said technology; even if the internet & Bitcoin were designed/developed by military initially that aspect is only a fraction of the total man effort invested into making what it is today; today it is a culmination of co-operative efforts & engineering by mostly peaceful individuals who care about building & maintainining high speed communication and/or payment networks. Misguided or not, most of these engineers would not be motivated to nor build or maintain if the foundation was not based on open-ness and unity.

Will (((they))) corrupt this creation, will they attack/destroy it, will they hijack it for their own selfish gains - of course and much of that will be made possible by those same misguided engineers who falsely 'believe' in whatever is being sold to them.