Generally, people want to contribute to a conversation ... to add to our collective understanding. Words mean nothing without documentation to support them.
Evidence of a single voice is still evidence. Discernment is critical.
Shit dude, I was a kid clipping articles for "current events" for school. Is your expectation reasonable or rational?
Edit: not that I don't appreciate your position.
Hearsay is not evidence.
It's not hearsay to me. Thusly it remains evidence.
Likewise, I didn't realize we entered a courtroom; with evidentiary rules. Perhaps you are lost on the internet? Does Mah know?
On the other hand however, many of us came to our current thinking through seeking out information on our own. If you want exact links, I suggest using the skills you should have earned throughout that process.
Demanding absolute proof for every. single. thought. is a kike tactic to make the process of speaking and sharing your thoughts with others grind to a halt.
If you want proof, do your own homework and find it yourself. You may surprise yourself in what you find along the way.
If you want exact links, I suggest using the skills you should have earned throughout that process.
I should look up the articles you remember reading? How does that even make sense to you?
(post is archived)