WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

link: https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1351562179892404229?s=21

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Generally, people want to contribute to a conversation ... to add to our collective understanding. Words mean nothing without documentation to support them.

[–] 0 pt

Evidence of a single voice is still evidence. Discernment is critical.

Shit dude, I was a kid clipping articles for "current events" for school. Is your expectation reasonable or rational?

Edit: not that I don't appreciate your position.

[–] -1 pt

Hearsay is not evidence.

[–] 0 pt

It's not hearsay to me. Thusly it remains evidence.

Likewise, I didn't realize we entered a courtroom; with evidentiary rules. Perhaps you are lost on the internet? Does Mah know?

[–] 0 pt

On the other hand however, many of us came to our current thinking through seeking out information on our own. If you want exact links, I suggest using the skills you should have earned throughout that process.

Demanding absolute proof for every. single. thought. is a kike tactic to make the process of speaking and sharing your thoughts with others grind to a halt.

If you want proof, do your own homework and find it yourself. You may surprise yourself in what you find along the way.

[–] 0 pt

If you want exact links, I suggest using the skills you should have earned throughout that process.

I should look up the articles you remember reading? How does that even make sense to you?