they “unintentionally reinforce the idea that marriage is most fitting between opposite sexes.”
But it is tho....
> they “unintentionally reinforce the idea that marriage is most fitting between opposite sexes.”
But it is tho....
Notice how one of the authors is dressed as conforming to the gender construct of 'female', itself a microaggressive set of behaviors which edifies marginalization of minoritized groups. In addition, she is a blonde white female (nazi) engaging in hypocrisy and inauthentic discourse on the subject of non-inclusion.
The triggering is multi-intersectional and demands a set of conversations about which conversation to initiate about triggerings.
s/
[one author of the article](https://msutoday.msu.edu/_/img/assets/2019/amy-bonomi-3.jpg)
Notice how one of the authors is dressed as conforming to the gender construct of 'female', itself a microaggressive set of behaviors which edifies marginalization of minoritized groups. In addition, she is a blonde white female (nazi) engaging in hypocrisy and inauthentic discourse on the subject of non-inclusion.
The triggering is multi-intersectional and demands a set of conversations about which conversation to initiate about triggerings.
s/
The sheer number of potential triggerings is triggering.
The sheer number of potential triggerings is triggering.
The problem isn't so much the triggerings causing triggering, it is the people removing said triggerings to placate and untrigger those triggered.
The triggered might go away or at least shut up when they realize no one gives a shit about their triggeredness.
The problem isn't so much the triggerings causing triggering, it is the people removing said triggerings to placate and untrigger those triggered.
The triggered might go away or at least shut up when they realize no one gives a shit about their triggeredness.
Removing triggerings is so triggering.
Removing triggerings is so triggering.
LITERALLY SHAKING!
LITERALLY SHAKING!
(post is archived)