This is your typical jewish sectarian bs at work here They launched the trend on the humanitarian/NGO side of things with their "associations for jewish holocaust survivor and their descents" Meaning that you were excluded from it if your were let's say freemason, gay, or communist in nazi camps. You're not jew it doesn't count. I mean for real they did just that and not just a little bit, quite a lot, after ww2 during the 60s/70s typically They don't need nazis to put walls and barbed wires around them, they do it on their own ... And here, well it's the same logic at work basically, a bunch of jews would be running the show or created it, I wouldn't be surprised. Just as I wouldn't be surprised to learn that, no, no jews here, it's just mindless goys replicating a pattern fed to them Imagine a cancer association reserved to whites, imagine the outrage ... But in the end, who is wrong who is right? Is it necesserally bad to make an association/organization excluding one or more real or perceived ethnic group, or reserved to one? Is it necessarilly good to make an association/organization open to everybody and anybody? Is judaism necessarilly bad? Is christianism necessarilly good? Because that's kind of the sort of deal you get in the end, but I digress ... What's for sure, is that under a common "umbrella", a common roof, a common flag, a common nation, a supremacist system (favors one group at the expense of all others, jews vs goys system basically) will not be able to coexist with an egalitarist/universalist system (christianism typically), because one will utimately run into the other, and interest will diverge strongly... And shareholders are entering an internal war, a death match... This is not good. And to be clear I'm not advocating for the destruction/ban of religions here, that's not the point, if anything all I'm saying is that you can't please everybody, "you can't have it both ways" Shit has to remain coherent for the sake of social cohesion, that's what I'm saying