WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

573

Don't worry, they will be a fully VAXed and Boosted Pilot for your safety.

Airlines, in their infinite mission to balance costs, profits, and keeping planes full of passengers alive between two points, might be going a little too far in their latest attempt to cut back.

According to CBS News, the industry has been quietly lobbing Congress to allow them to use just one pilot in the cockpit instead of two, as is currently required by part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. . . .

https://archive.vn/eEg4j

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/airlines-lobbying-congress-allow-just-one-pilot-cockpit

Don't worry, they will be a fully VAXed and Boosted Pilot for your safety. >Airlines, in their infinite mission to balance costs, profits, and keeping planes full of passengers alive between two points, might be going a little too far in their latest attempt to cut back. >According to CBS News, the industry has been quietly lobbing Congress to allow them to use just one pilot in the cockpit instead of two, as is currently required by part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. . . . https://archive.vn/eEg4j https://www.zerohedge.com/political/airlines-lobbying-congress-allow-just-one-pilot-cockpit

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Even without the injections it would be dangerous. Aircraft which require two or more aircrew is decided based on workload during takeoff and landing. Multiple aircrews are used to both prevent error and crashes. It's literally there primary safety loop for complex commercial aircraft.

Workload and the resulting errors remains the number one cause of accusing accidents according to both the NTSB and the FAA.

Anyone hoping for fewer cockpit aircrews is fighting to support more aviation crashes. They want to shutdown pubic air travel?