Well, this is fucking false. I remember quite far back and this is total and utter bullshit. There are no two year olds solving the Riemann hypothesis.
Nasa is the organization that claimed to have found Arsenic based life (as opposed to carbon based life) which was utter bullshit: https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/02dec_monolake
It isn't that two year olds should be able to prove the Riemann sum hypothesis, it is that by the time they even hear about the Reimann " " they have been warped by min maxing grades, group projects, learning and unlearning shit, and being forced to accept the teacher's word as law. So many students who are more intelligent than the teacher, by law of averages has to be more than one a year, go unrecognized and don't get any of the sparse resources dedicated to the top decile while the bottom quartile gets easily half the time, attention, and money in the education environment.
Aka common core
Creativity does not imply intelligence.
Creativity is associated with the traits openness and a lack of conscientiousness. Openness generally, but not always, comes with intelligence. People with high openness and a lack of intelligence might be really creative in fields that don't take intelligence such as art or music.
People with high openness and a lack of intelligence might be really creative in fields that don't take intelligence such as art or music.
That would be my point.
(post is archived)