this is false. there were several newspapers printed long before ww2 that specifically mentioned the 6 million number as well as references to a "holocaust"
Different holocausts and decades prior. I've posted this before. So those aren't the WW2 fake and for you to claim they were and my statement is false is not only wrong it's jewish.
https://mega.nz/folder/6P40VDDI#qROq9KnbhQo4abfzaC_MtQ WW2 starts 1939 by the way. But (((you))) knew that.
they found small traces of the gas on the walls. the revisionist explanation is that these rooms were used for delousing, which makes sense because the amounts found were minimal. either way, saying "0 evidence" is bullshit. if we stoop to outright lies, we are no better than they are.
You're just being jewish now. There was never any denial that zyklon b, a delousing agent was used. You present evidence that supports delousing as the reason for the existence of irrelevant amounts on the wall but you ignore the wooden doors, the holes in the doors, the holes in the ceilings etc. Why are you picking and choosing and only picking the jew narrative.
You're lying, splitting differences while ignoring facts, inserting your own jewish narrative and then "hurrrrrr you're right." all you're doing is attempting to slide the narrative.
@The_Real_Johnny_Ninja I forgot to confirm, answer my 3 questions please. @putinisinnocent answer them as well please. 1) Are there any good jews? 2) Which economic system do jews fear? 3) Which religion is the most anti-jew faith there is?
The newspapers before mentioned holocausts of 6 million victims you dumb fuck. This means they were pushing that narrative long before ww2, essentially grooming the population for what coincidentally would happen in the near future
The claim was that gas was used. They found gas on the walls. This could be considered evidence for them. I personally think it was for delousing but it doesn’t change the fact that gas was found and supports their narrative
It’s not Jewish to acknowledge their arguments so that they can be countered but keeping calling people Jews for pointing out basic shit. Ironically your tactics are the same as Jews do when accusing people of muh antisemitisms rather than honestly engage in the discussion instead of getting all butthurt about it
This means they were pushing that narrative long before ww2
Yes. But not the WW2 holohoax as I specified and you ignored. That wouldn't be the one the soldiers "would recount" as was asked by the OP. Why you can't distinguish this is astonishing. Also evidence of a delousing agent is not evidence of a deadly chemical attack agent. Despite how you may pilpul it as.
Answer the questions ari.
you're too retarded to have a reasonable discussion with
(post is archived)