WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Yall heard of this or is this a joke?? lmao.

Yall heard of this or is this a joke?? lmao.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

As funny as a communist with an opinion on how to run the economy...

Kind of sad actually...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Patmos

John of Patmos (also called John the Revelator, John the Divine, John the Theologian) is the name traditionally given to the author of the Book of Revelation. The text of Revelation states that John was on Patmos, a Greek island where, according to most biblical historians, he was exiled as a result of anti-Christian persecution under the Roman emperor Domitian.[1][2]

Christian tradition has considered the Book of Revelation's writer to be John the Evangelist (or possibly John the Apostle), purported author of the Gospel of John. A minority of senior clerics and scholars, such as Eusebius (d. 339/340), recognize at least one further John as a companion of Jesus, John the Presbyter. Some Christian scholars since medieval times separate the disciple from the writer of Revelation.[3][4]

Educate yourself

Oh btw, the KJV your ex pastor turned "aryan" that he used https://poal.co/s/Christianity/485905 it's not exactly a good reference

[–] 0 pt

Not a communist. (I was one in college before I got the shit kicked out of me lol.)

It's very hard to decipher who wrote and re wrote and edited the books that make up the Bible because they are not exactly named and authored. What about the council of Nicea for instance that is totally foul-play.

Everyone knows the KJV sucks. That ex-pastor is aware of it, he translates exactly from the original languages. You have to translate to the original languages in my opinion.

[–] 0 pt

The communist part was a metaphor...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedevacantism

Sedevacantism is a doctrinal position within traditionalist Catholicism[1][2] which holds that the present occupier of the Holy See is not a valid pope due to the pope's espousal of one or more heresies and that therefore, for lack of a valid pope, the See of Rome is vacant.

The term sedevacantism is derived from the Latin phrase sede vacante, which means "with the chair [i.e. of the Bishop of Rome] being vacant".[3] The phrase is commonly used to refer specifically to a vacancy of the Holy See from the death, the resignation, the falling into insanity, or the public heresy of a pope to the election of his successor.

Among those who maintain that the see of Rome, occupied by what they declare to be an illegitimate pope, was really vacant, some have chosen an alternative pope of their own, thereby in their view ending the vacancy of the see; such are known sometimes as conclavists.[4]

The number of sedevacantists is unknown and difficult to measure; estimates range from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedeprivationism

Sedeprivationism is a doctrinal position within Traditionalist Catholicism which holds that the current occupant of the Holy See is a duly-elected pope, but lacks the authority and ability to teach or to govern unless he recants the changes brought by the Second Vatican Council.[1] The doctrine asserts that since this council, occupants of the See of Peter are popes materialiter sed non formaliter, that is "materially but not formally". As such, sedeprivationists teach that Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI, Pope John Paul I, Pope John Paul II, and Pope Benedict XVI have not attained fullness of the papacy.[2]

Sedeprivationism is held by some traditionalist Catholic groups such as the Istituto Mater Boni Consilii and Orthodox Roman Catholic Movement, among others. The doctrine of Sedeprivationism traces its origin to the Thesis of Cassiciacum of the Dominican Catholic theologian Michel-Louis Guérard des Lauriers.[3]

https://pic8.co/sh/AE9uju.jpeg