WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

615

Yall heard of this or is this a joke?? lmao.

Yall heard of this or is this a joke?? lmao.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The communist part was a metaphor...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedevacantism

Sedevacantism is a doctrinal position within traditionalist Catholicism[1][2] which holds that the present occupier of the Holy See is not a valid pope due to the pope's espousal of one or more heresies and that therefore, for lack of a valid pope, the See of Rome is vacant.

The term sedevacantism is derived from the Latin phrase sede vacante, which means "with the chair [i.e. of the Bishop of Rome] being vacant".[3] The phrase is commonly used to refer specifically to a vacancy of the Holy See from the death, the resignation, the falling into insanity, or the public heresy of a pope to the election of his successor.

Among those who maintain that the see of Rome, occupied by what they declare to be an illegitimate pope, was really vacant, some have chosen an alternative pope of their own, thereby in their view ending the vacancy of the see; such are known sometimes as conclavists.[4]

The number of sedevacantists is unknown and difficult to measure; estimates range from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedeprivationism

Sedeprivationism is a doctrinal position within Traditionalist Catholicism which holds that the current occupant of the Holy See is a duly-elected pope, but lacks the authority and ability to teach or to govern unless he recants the changes brought by the Second Vatican Council.[1] The doctrine asserts that since this council, occupants of the See of Peter are popes materialiter sed non formaliter, that is "materially but not formally". As such, sedeprivationists teach that Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI, Pope John Paul I, Pope John Paul II, and Pope Benedict XVI have not attained fullness of the papacy.[2]

Sedeprivationism is held by some traditionalist Catholic groups such as the Istituto Mater Boni Consilii and Orthodox Roman Catholic Movement, among others. The doctrine of Sedeprivationism traces its origin to the Thesis of Cassiciacum of the Dominican Catholic theologian Michel-Louis Guérard des Lauriers.[3]

https://pic8.co/sh/AE9uju.jpeg

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt (edited )

Omg this guy https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1

I can't stand him quite frankly, he spends way too much time trying to explain why alex jones is bad, it's kind of pathetic. "I get it, you wish you had alex jones success/audience and he won't name the jew etc, now let's move on... Algiht?" - "Alright... But let me tell you again why alex jones is bad and why you shouldn't listen to him!" -______-

And the worst part maybe is that he's not even funny, did he ever smile? Can he pull a joke? I suspect this guy really isn't capable of humor, at all, takes himself way too seriously. Paranoid narcissist of the worst kind. The boring kind with zero charisma

Now maybe I'm wrong, since I haven't spent a lot of time looking into his stuffs for reasons mentioned above, but every time someone posted a video of him here, it was a video of him explaining why alex jones is bad...

That being said, on side bar I've found this video https://odysee.com/@deepinfos:0/File166:3

I don't know what to make of that, what to say of it, other than "way to ruin a supposed thousand years old book arkhmed... Wtf is your problem can't you put a pair of gloves and stop spreading your finger tips grease all over it? Just stop, stop twisting that old thing!"

But I digress...

The problem when you build yourself in opposition to a thing, such as jews for instance, is that once that thing is removed you lose your "raison d'être"

Kind of like a tree growing against a wall, remove the wall the tree dies

Take anti communists, CIA, NATO... The day the soviet union collapsed, they all attained their supposed long standing goal... And at the same time they all realized they kind of lost their job, it's going to be hard to justify all those lines of credits, budgets, now that the very reason justifying those is gone...

So since that day, they've been busy trying to justify their salary, they had to come up with something new... And here we are today

[–] 0 pt

Dying laughing at your reaction to that video of a, (looks to be authentic,) satanic handbook. It's definitely star of remphan/ mixed with Zodiacal (?) symbology and then Baphomet at the end, their true trans-god. Many people are not archivists, so they wouldn't know how to preserve an object like that lol...

I would argue Baphomet/ trans gender-queering is also the true god of the Bible itself, since yahweh is such a flagrant, insecure sexist and a jealous genocidal maniac, also Judaic Kabbalah states Yahweh joins with Shekinah in the Holy of Holies, right?

As far as Adam Green goes, he is an Academic primarily, not a comedian. If he was a comedian, you would be bitching to me that he's not Academic enough lol. It's easier to criticize than respect the research he is bringing to the table.

Finally, there's no need to worry about what we will do after our adversary is removed, since at the moment, we should be valuing Truth, Justice, Virtue, and protecting our children from these Leviathans. wouldn't you agree? First things first.

But anyway, you're like a Voltaire type, huh, penpal? Voltaire mixed with moliere/ baudelaire https://fleursdumal.org/poem/103 lol