Yeah but at least, in the case of jews did 911, as you stated, there's a bunch of, how could I call that... "Circumstantial evidences", as opposed to direct evidence
>Circumstantial evidence is a set of facts from which one may infer the fact in question.
Like blackholes, sort of. You can't prove they materially exist because they are immaterial, literally. But you can tell one is present by observing the discontinuity it induces in its environment
Yeah but at least, in the case of jews did 911, as you stated, there's a bunch of, how could I call that... "Circumstantial evidences", as opposed to direct evidence
>>Circumstantial evidence is a set of facts from which one may infer the fact in question.
Like blackholes, sort of. You can't prove they materially exist because they are immaterial, literally. But you can tell one is present by observing the discontinuity it induces in its environment
Yes, and people are convicted on a multiplicity of circumstantial evidence all the time.
Yes, and people are convicted on a multiplicity of circumstantial evidence all the time.
(post is archived)