>we are in the middle of demonic invasion from a parallel dimension invading this world through people
Why not? I mean, the universe is so vast, and us, so microscopically small in comparison, and our knowledge of what we call reality is even smaller than what we are
But, if that claim, or any rather bold claim, can't be demonstrated/backed with facts... Well then it's a story. Just a story.
Exactly. Or a theory, 'just a theory.'
When I first heard that a DEW took down the twin towers I laughed, but having looked into it, well it's a good example of convincing proof that that is what happened.
Of course, I don't expect anyone to accept what I say, one would have to be persuaded after having done the same due diligence I did (and even then, you don't have to believe it, however unwise it would be not to, after being presented with the evidence).
Something like that.
Yeah but at least, in the case of jews did 911, as you stated, there's a bunch of, how could I call that... "Circumstantial evidences", as opposed to direct evidence
>Circumstantial evidence is a set of facts from which one may infer the fact in question.
Like blackholes, sort of. You can't prove they materially exist because they are immaterial, literally. But you can tell one is present by observing the discontinuity it induces in its environment
Yes, and people are convicted on a multiplicity of circumstantial evidence all the time.
(post is archived)