Anarchy = no rulers
Communism = bureaucrat rulers
Choose one. Also, under Laissez-faire there would be no bums, because they'd die if left to their own devices, and would be killed when trespassing.
And once again I notice, that you're stupid and talking to you is a waste of time. Go to /leftypol/ and vote (((democrat))).
There can be rulers AND anarchy, think madmax
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/anarchy
1 a state of society without government or law.
2 political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control
3 lack of obedience to an authority; insubordination
4 confusion and disorder
...
You guys use words you didn't bother to look up, that's twice now
Also, your definition of communism isn't the definition of communism, communism is much more than just "bureaucracy", otherwise every government on earth with a bureaucracy (thefreedictionary.com) (which one doesn't have that?) is communist, which is obviously false
>And once again I notice...
Once again you are flat wrong from the get go, you use words and concepts you don't even understand
And that's a fact, jackass
>Also, under Laissez-faire there would be no bums, because they'd die if left to their own devices, and would be killed when trespassing.
That's the line of reasoning of a first world rich kid who knows nothing about what real life looks like
You'll get pandemic levels going through the roof to begin with, the sanitary aspect of the situation is something that escapes you entirely (just like the twitter valley faggots surrounded by a sea of shit now in commiefornia), and none of your toys is going to fix the sea of misery surrounding your pathetic imaginary castle
You helicoptarians are unfit to even run a fucking bakery, a bunch camping larpers with a god complex
You can screech
(post is archived)