Honestly it seems a bit silly.
Adds unneeded weight to the rifle.
A sidearm is only for backup / cqb when you have a rifle and should be quickly accessible. (This is not when compared to a hip/leg holster)
But... but... but... it's cool.
Honestly it seems a bit silly.
Adds unneeded weight to the rifle.
A sidearm is only for backup / cqb when you have a rifle and should be quickly accessible. (This is not when compared to a hip/leg holster)
But... but... but... it's cool.
That's some nigger tier shit tbh. Lets put a gun in a gun and make it harder to get to and take as much time as reloading for a less effective weapon.
ok but the video posted by someone above, kind of makes it easy to see it being useful in some admittedly 'edge cases'.
Still, if that shotty fails, runs dry on ammo or is otherwise not functioning, not a bad day to have an extra pistola.
I cannot vouch for the fit, feel or any of that, which probably is rather awkward. It wouldnt take me as long as a reload to draw that out and go. Assuming the release switch works decently.
There's no 'regular need' for it. Agreed. Only the irregular need of some 'oh shit' and 'thank goodness I had that pistol'
It is unlikely to be a game saver, but the fact that it could be, helps... Still probably will never own anything like this.
You've never carried weight over long distances
You assume I am civilian and you are incorrect.
All my gear was heavy and all my stations were hot.
That tiny glock is the least of my worries.
That said, I also would be unlikely to take this into the field.
a pistol is a significant amount of added weight
i bet you lift soupcans and think your hot shit.
All you military guys assume you have it the hardest. Do you know what's really hard. Being a civilian and carrying a heavy gun when you don't have to. My rule is, if it's heavy I won't carry it. If I don't carry it, it's worthless. Light is especially the way to go when you don't have an employer demanding that you carry it.
Yes.
MULE (thefirearmblog.com)
(post is archived)