Fully semi-automatic AR-15s and the magazines that come standard with them are not “arms” protected by the Second Amendment because they are “indistinguishable” from fully-automatic machineguns like the M16.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

129

•

Fully semi-automatic AR-15s and the magazines that come standard with them are not “arms” protected by the Second Amendment because they are “indistinguishable” from fully-automatic machineguns like the M16. (thereload.com)

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny.

Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny. Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (14).

[–] • 1 pt

Yep, back then everyone one knew exactly what 'arms ' meant and the context it derived in the literature. Today some people cant describe what 'a woman' is or what the word means - in part that agenda enables a segue into this distorted re-defining of once commonly accepted words terms meanings.

parent
link