WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

902

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny.

Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny. Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The Second Amendment does not contain any language in it that distinguishes one type of firearm from another. It does not exclude any "arms" at all and neither does it classify what "arms" are in the first place. They are really desperate to disarm us and will make up unconstitutional bullshit like this to justify it.

[–] 1 pt

Yep, back then everyone one knew exactly what 'arms ' meant and the context it derived in the literature. Today some people cant describe what 'a woman' is or what the word means - in part that agenda enables a segue into this distorted re-defining of once commonly accepted words terms meanings.