WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

282

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny.

Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

The second you redefine a particular gun as legal or illegal, you're opening the door for tyranny. Either owning guns is a protected right or it isn't. Distinguishing allowable guns from non allowable guns only ensures that all guns will eventually be illegal. Like freedom of speech: you either have it or you do not.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

The 5.56mm semi automatic rifle is the most common gun purchased for personal defense by the public. Good luck trying to come and take them.

[–] 3 pts

This is just another criminal liberal/communist Lie. Their 'list' of 'assault rifles' INCLUDES the Ruger 10-22 because it is exactly the same weapon as the AR-15, in 22 long rifle Cal. SO, they want to Ban ALL semi-auto weapons.

[–] 3 pts

They want to ban all weapons. Their typical strategy is to get people to agree that there are no absolutes. They elicit examples they can trot out showing how horrible certain guns are and attempt to ban only bad scary guns. Next, they lower the bar to less scary guns, then specific accessories. They never talk about people killing people, rather they focus on the gun aspect.

[–] 2 pts

Yes correct - and ultimately reduce high capacity magazines down to 5 cartridges.

[–] 1 pt

This sets it up for a trip up to The Supremes.

[–] 1 pt

The whole point is to allow people to arm themselves with weapons of war.

[–] 1 pt

Don't even give one single fucking inch. Rather, take the high ground and get remove their unconstitutional laws.

[–] 1 pt

This will go to SCOTUS and get slapped down by the common use standard, Bruen, etc.

[–] 1 pt

The Second Amendment does not contain any language in it that distinguishes one type of firearm from another. It does not exclude any "arms" at all and neither does it classify what "arms" are in the first place. They are really desperate to disarm us and will make up unconstitutional bullshit like this to justify it.

[–] 1 pt

Yep, back then everyone one knew exactly what 'arms ' meant and the context it derived in the literature. Today some people cant describe what 'a woman' is or what the word means - in part that agenda enables a segue into this distorted re-defining of once commonly accepted words terms meanings.

[–] 0 pt

Are you retarded? WTF is a fully semi-automatic? Do you own firearms?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

An absurd reference to

What's scarier "semi-automatic" or "Fully semi-automatic"? You be the judge.