Shall not be infringed means each and every "gun law" is unconstitutional
Shall not be infringed means each and every "gun law" is unconstitutional
Good result, bad ruling.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin ruled that no historical standard exists to demonstrate that firearms without a serial number are more dangerous or unusual than firearms with a serial number, so the law is unconstitutional.
without a serial number are more dangerous or unusual than firearms with a serial number
That isn't what the Bruen decision stated. The test wasn't a test of dangerousness. It was a 1-step test. "Is it constitutional under the 2nd amendment?" AKA is it an infringement? This decision is controlled. There are bits like above in the Bruen decision that I don't like either.
Good result, bad ruling.
>U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin ruled that no historical standard exists to demonstrate that firearms without a serial number are more dangerous or unusual than firearms with a serial number, so the law is unconstitutional.
>>without a serial number are more dangerous or unusual than firearms with a serial number
That isn't what the Bruen decision stated. The test wasn't a test of dangerousness. It was a 1-step test. "Is it constitutional under the 2nd amendment?" AKA is it an infringement?
This decision is controlled. There are bits like above in the Bruen decision that I don't like either.
(post is archived)