Oh logic, dear logic, when did you die?
Carrying liability insurance for something does not make you liable.
Oh logic, dear logic, when did you die?
Carrying liability insurance for something does not make you liable.
For anyone not already aware, this would constitute a de facto ban on firearm ownership. While there are some insurers for self-defense, and some insurers for accidents, there are no insurers for "anything that results from gun use" because no one insures wilful, non-defensive gun use. E.g. murdering someone, discharging a firearm into the air, brandishing, etc are all covered by precisely zero insurers.
For anyone not already aware, this would constitute a de facto ban on firearm ownership. While there are some insurers for *self-defense*, and some insurers for *accidents*, there are no insurers for *"anything that results from gun use"* because no one insures wilful, non-defensive gun use. E.g. murdering someone, discharging a firearm into the air, brandishing, etc are all covered by precisely zero insurers.
(post is archived)