Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

257

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

whose dick did glock suck to keep off that list?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

whose dick did glock suck to keep off that list?

You're looking at the problem the wrong way.

Huge assortment of the guns on that list are cheap pieces of hot garbage. $100 guns and such.

$700+ guns like Glocks are not.

In simple terms, the guns the rich & political class can afford were left off.. because only the rich and political class can afford them.

See how it works in California?

[–] • 1 pt

A Ruger .357 revolver is NOT a $100 gun. There are quite a few on the list which are not as well. Your argument absolutely fails.

[–] • 0 pt

Thats not true, I saw dozens of four figured smiths and colts in there.

[–] • 0 pt

They're decertified because no handgun can be sold in California unless manufacturers submit each model and each variation to very expensive testing and requirements that were not designed for safety, but to erect significant barriers to selling in California. The point of "the roster" is to reduce availability to Californians.

[–] • 0 pt

You are incorrect. Read my comment for more info. The Hi-Point C-9 is on the sell list.

[–] • 0 pt

Idk, I see Sigs and FN's on that list. But you're probably right. Betting their cops all use glocks, too.

[–] • 0 pt

If a nigger can afford the latest iPhone, he can also afford the $700 for a glock.

[–] • 1 pt

Niggers get glocks like they get iphones. They steal them.

[–] • 0 pt

Terrible argument. Meet Obama phone and financing.

How does a nigger finance a pistol, genius?

[–] • 0 pt

Some handguns have a "cc" version. I see the non cc version of one that I own listed, in all colors, but not the cc version.

In this instance the cc version is a little smaller with low profile sights.

I wonder if it was missed. Or maybe the built in trigger lock kept it off the list.

[–] • 1 pt

Certifications expire. That's all this list is. Your will expire when its term is up. Nothing to do with safety.

[–] • 0 pt

They list colors, does that mean if the color isn't listed it's fine? Are all of the ladies with their hot pink handguns still good to buy more?

[–] • 0 pt

No. These models were removed from the already restricted "safe" list. To be sold in California a specific model has to be on the list. So if a manufacturer brings out a new color of an approved pistol, it isn't on the list and cannot be sold.

And the list is one-way only. Existing models can be removed but new models can't be added.

[–] • 0 pt

Wow. That is astonishingly oppressive.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, they're sure looking out for those poor law-abiding citizens who now can't afford to arm themselves against criminals who don't buy off the shelf anyway. It has become clear for quite some time that they are setting up the uprising. They are aggressively trying to anger normies into a slaughter they can exploit.

[–] • 0 pt

That is not how it works. CA dropped these models because the manufacturer(s) did not re-up for yet another “drop test” certification. ‘‘Tis means that a model that is certified, fees for testing paid and whatnot, can only stay on the list as long as the manufacturer continues to pay for that model to re-cert. if the market isn’t good for a particular model, the manufacturer may choose to not re-cert that model, while other models it makes are doing well in that market, so they re-cert.

It sucks, and I’m not blaming the companies. I’m just explaining how it works.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

TL/DR - What is the motivation?

[–] • 0 pt

Shall not be infringed