predicted to generate an extra $30,000 a year to “provide public benefit to residents of Tacoma related to gun violence
Comitted by guns and ammo that are traded off the books, in the streets, by people who are not allowed to be around them, thus never able to generate any tax income by those measures, right?
I think it is fundamentally unfair for all of us who are non-gun users to bare all of the burden of gun violence in our community.”
So gun owner don't pay taxes that go towards hospitals and community programs, among them those that try to reduce violence?
>predicted to generate an extra $30,000 a year to “provide public benefit to residents of Tacoma related to gun violence
Comitted by guns and ammo that are traded off the books, in the streets, by people who are not allowed to be around them, thus never able to generate any tax income by those measures, right?
>I think it is fundamentally unfair for all of us who are non-gun users to bare all of the burden of gun violence in our community.”
So gun owner don't pay taxes that go towards hospitals and community programs, among them those that try to reduce violence?
(post is archived)