You're suggesting keeping 24 loaded 30-round magazines? I'm not opposed, I'm just questioning the logistics, practicality, and ultimately your ammo capacity in an extended firefight scenario (albeit highly unlikely).
In an epic battle, 720 rounds pre-loaded + 720 rounds in clips is still trumped by 1440 rounds in clips, particularly the Garand style clips. I don't particularly like the SKS style using normal stripper clips, but it fits the category.
24 loaded AR mags is nothing. Some people have way more than that https://pic8.co/sh/J8Vam2.gif
- 24 magazines costs?
- How about for magazines that never jam, how much do those cost?
- Is each magazine independently tested fully loaded?
- How much extra does it cost to test?
By the time you test enough of them, the magazines cost more than another gun would.
I've shot a lot of ARs with a lot of mags. I've never seen one jam. I don't think clips are superior to mags for defending a static position, they would only be superior in the one-in-a-trillion scenario I described. Yes, magazines cost more than clips. But unless you're super broke, they are worth the extra cost. I feel like a 30-round en-bloc clip would be much more unwieldy and fragile than a regular AR or AK mag.
(post is archived)