At least they admit it has to offer something to make up for the increased complexity.
I don't think it offers much though.
If the US military was keen to increase the effectiveness of their rifles, they should withdraw from the treaty prohibiting explosive anti-personnel rifle rounds.
At least they admit it has to offer something to make up for the increased complexity.
I don't think it offers much though.
If the US military was keen to increase the effectiveness of their rifles, they should withdraw from the treaty prohibiting explosive anti-personnel rifle rounds.
(post is archived)