Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

808

Carrying a rifle across state lines is not a crime.

Carrying a rifle across state lines even as a minor is not a crime as long as he was legally in possession of the rifle in both his home state and the state he was in.

Carrying a rifle across state lines and using it for self defense is not a crime, even as a minor.

The only things that matters is weather use of force was justified for self defense.

Why is the angry mob so focused on inter-state transportation of a firearm? I am not a local to either of these states and I am not an expert on the local state laws but I know the federal laws quite well and I just don't see what they are salivating over. What is the angle they are working?

Carrying a rifle across state lines is not a crime. Carrying a rifle across state lines even as a minor is not a crime as long as he was legally in possession of the rifle in both his home state and the state he was in. Carrying a rifle across state lines and using it for self defense is not a crime, even as a minor. The only things that matters is weather use of force was justified for self defense. Why is the angry mob so focused on inter-state transportation of a firearm? I am not a local to either of these states and I am not an expert on the local state laws but I know the federal laws quite well and I just don't see what they are salivating over. What is the angle they are working?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] • 0 pt

It's not that carrying the firearm across state lines (even though he didn't) is even illegal in WI, if you legally own it.
The entire point of the exercise is to paint Rittenhouse as someone who went to Kenosha with the intent to kill people. They're throwing as much clutter as they can in order to cloud the truth of the story.