Carrying a rifle across state lines is not a crime.
Carrying a rifle across state lines even as a minor is not a crime as long as he was legally in possession of the rifle in both his home state and the state he was in.
Carrying a rifle across state lines and using it for self defense is not a crime, even as a minor.
The only things that matters is weather use of force was justified for self defense.
Why is the angry mob so focused on inter-state transportation of a firearm? I am not a local to either of these states and I am not an expert on the local state laws but I know the federal laws quite well and I just don't see what they are salivating over. What is the angle they are working?
Carrying a rifle across state lines is not a crime.
Carrying a rifle across state lines even as a minor is not a crime as long as he was legally in possession of the rifle in both his home state and the state he was in.
Carrying a rifle across state lines and using it for self defense is not a crime, even as a minor.
The only things that matters is weather use of force was justified for self defense.
Why is the angry mob so focused on inter-state transportation of a firearm? I am not a local to either of these states and I am not an expert on the local state laws but I know the federal laws quite well and I just don't see what they are salivating over. What is the angle they are working?
(post is archived)