Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

746

granting it every economic advantage, leeway and exchange of secrets (exactly what so many jews got caught doing for the soviets) possible until they could be big enough to be a 'threat' to America. Jews will always try to keep a balance of powers to remove the risk of losing the world if they lose control over America.

granting it every economic advantage, leeway and exchange of secrets (exactly what so many jews got caught doing for the soviets) possible until they could be big enough to be a 'threat' to America. Jews will always try to keep a balance of powers to remove the risk of losing the world if they lose control over America.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 0 pt

how is that a threat? the US can easily defend its borders

[–] • 0 pt

You can't shot down refugees. You couldn't turn around the Vietnamese, Korean, etc.

If you don't live in fantasy toughguy land, it's a legitimate threat.

[–] • 0 pt

but the ocean gap is far too wide. the chinks would have to ferry them all the way, in which case easy as fuck to blame the humanitarian crisis on them. in fact the US media could easily twist the narrative even if it was America at fault, let alone when it is not at fault, and shape public opinion. it is exactly this twisting, in reverse, that enables the threat in the first place. if the US was a sovereign non-jewish state then this is not a threat. it's only a threat because jews are using it to destroy america, and the chinks could threaten acceleration to an unstable degree.

[–] • 0 pt

The US and the West were already blaming the humanitarian crisis on the Chinese and using that argument to prevent them from accessing the monetary market. The Chinese were putting pressure on the West to access the monetary market and stop the humanitarian crisis. The US position was always the one that couldn't solve the problem and even if the media had been on the US side, they wouldn't have won a propaganda war.

The US was already blaming China for the humanitarian crisis, they would still blame China for the 100,000s of boat & plane they'd be sending, but that's just hammering the same point while having to deal with terns of millions of refugees and millions of dead refugees. China doesn't care, it has plenty to spare, but people in the US wouldn't be able to stomach all the death and the new population. Certainly not for something as abstract and meaningless to the population as accessing the monetary fund.